    |
  |
        |
|
|
November 2007
SELECTBOARDMINUTES OF MEETINGNOVEMBER 13, 2007 MEMBERS PRESENT: Jim Talley, Chairperson; Robert Roesler, Jane McKnight, Chris Boyd. (Absent: Bill Smith) ADMINISTRATION: Paul Bohne, Town Manager; Peter Frankenburg, Financial Officer; Dean Pierce, Town Planner; Bernie Gagnon, Public works Director. OTHERS PRESENT: Chris Lathrop, David Brown, Anne Brown, Peter Gibbs, Charles Schmitt, Dick Reid, Rob Donahue, David Sheldon, Kathy Twombly, Bill Storey, Jeff Pauze, John Madden, Peter Twombly, Gillian Senior, Roy Lesperance, Linda Lesperance, Joyce Errecart, Persis Worrall, Sylvia Leviel, Sylvia Horton, Alain Boisjelli, Paul Potts, Laurence Barber, John Macy, Gabriela Meyer, Ed Bouton, Darienne Oaks, Johanna Rolston, Bob Bick, H. Wright Caswell, Margaret Ottinger, Gail Albert, Fred Schmidt, Chris Preston (Shelburne News). 1. CALL TO ORDER Mr. Talley, Chairperson, called the meeting to order at 7:10 p.m. 2. CHANGES TO AGENDA None. 3. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION None. 4. PUBLIC COMMENT: LOCATION OF 115kv LINE THROUGH PROPERTY OF MEACH COVE Mr. Talley noted that the proposed VELCO 115 kV line route is still in litigation. The Town’s position and objective remains the same (underground the line as much as possible). PUBLIC COMMENTS Jeff Pauze, resident, questioned the VELCO proposal to route the line through wetlands behind residential areas. Mr. Pauze asked if the town supports the line through McCabe’s Brook. Mr. Talley reiterated the town position is to put the line underground. In August 2004 comments were received and the Town petitioned the Public Service Board (PSB) to acknowledge that Shelburne did not support the initial layout of the line, and to request that the PSB ask VELCO to explore a line route through McCabe’s Brook. VELCO did not do the analysis. Peter Twombly, resident, stated according to Sarah Hoffman, attorney representing the PSB the Town of Shelburne wants the power line in McCabe’s Brook. Mr. Talley cautioned against taking two days of testimony from hearings on January 1, 2007 and November 12, 2007 out of context. The PSB heard Shelburne’s position. Mr. Twombly asked if the Town’s strategy is to ask the PSB to investigate the wetlands more thoroughly. Ms. McKnight explained the Town’s legal counsel represented Shelburne at the hearings. The Selectboard is briefed regarding alternatives, such as putting the line under ground. The town does not have the power to determine where the line will be located. Ideally the PSB takes all issues into account and a balance is found between aesthetics, health and safety issues. The Selectboard comes to a consensus regarding strategies after hearing public comment on issues. The goal is to underground sections of the line. Mr. Talley stated there was an original order from the PSB to VELCO regarding a route running along the rear of the Shelburne Museum. The order was to “work with the Shelburne Museum and the Town of Shelburne to reach a mutually agreeable route”. Mr. Roesler pointed out the PSB has jurisdiction and can ask for more evidence or information to which the town will respond, but once the PSB makes a decision the process is finished. Mr. Bohne noted there are some procedural avenues that the Town can pursue. Mr. Bohne stated alternatives include exploring a wetland route through McCabe’s Brook, going overland through Meach Cove along the tree line on top of the hill, or going along Limerick Road (Pole #298 south). The town has not taken a position regarding McCabe’s Brook. A line design has not been provided by VELCO as yet. VELCO designs the route. Dick Reid, resident, asked why VELCO decided to run the line above ground east at Pole #298 when this may not have been the case in the early stages of planning (the town suggested going underground all along Limerick Road and Depot Road). Mr. Talley recalled the PSB rejected the suggestion several times. Paul Bohne said having four poles in the wetlands is more practical then going down Limerick Road and Depot Road. The poles are already in the wetlands. There was further discussion of the route through McCabe’s Brook. It was noted the town and Meach Cove are separate entities each with their separate counsel on the VELCO matter. Mr. Talley commented it is in the town’s best interest for the respective attorneys to know the town’s strategy. Roy Lesperance, resident, expressed dismay and frustration at the location of the line through the wetlands and close to back yards, forcing residents to support the line going through Meach Cove as a result. Residents can submit testimony to the PSB, but it is questionable that the PSB will support spending eight times the amount of money in order to put the line underground versus above ground by Limerick Road. If the line goes through the wetlands, continued Mr. Lesperance, the line will be 50’ from his back yard. Bob Bick, resident, asked if all communication with Meach Cove has been through the Town Attorney and Town Manager. Mr. Bohne confirmed he has had conversations with Meach Cove. Mr. Bick felt the town has the obligation to share information with all entities especially since there has been discussion already with Meach Cove. Mr. Bick asked how much the town has spent on legal fees to date and if the fees are paid on an accrued basis. Mr. Bohne estimated $12,000 to $15,000 has been paid in legal fees. Mr. Bick asked about the implications if the PSB ruling is determined to be consistent with the town strategy, and if not whether the town would litigate. Mr. Roesler explained the issue is before the Supreme Court and until a decision is rendered the implications are not known. The Selectboard is as frustrated as the citizens. Mr. Bick observed the Board’s decision was based on the hearing and comments from the public, pointing out there were no comments in support of the wetlands route being viable. Mr. Boyd invited all to send letters to the PSB. A general letter with signatures from residents will aid the town in pursing the ultimate goal to underground the line. Joyce Errecart, resident and State Representative, noted there may be legal ambiguity with ANR jurisdiction related to the wetland. Ms. Errecart will investigate the matter and see what could be done legislatively. 5. PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION OF THE CONCEPTUAL PLAN FOR THE WEBSTER ROAD BIKE PATH Dean Pierce, Town Planner, introduced Chris Lathrop from DuBois & King and gave a brief history of the Webster Road bike path project that began in the 1990s. The enhancement grant required a feasibility study and guidelines. The original study by Civil Engineering Associates did not follow the guidelines so Wilber Smith was hired to do the study. Jim Donavan, consultant, reported there is significant likelihood that a designed path would be successful/feasible. DuBois & King was hired to build the Webster Road segment funded by the $300,000 enhancement grant. Chris Lathrop reviewed the conceptual design and lay out of the proposed path as shown on a topographical map starting east of the Old Route 7/Webster Road junction, running east and tying into an existing path at Boulder Hill. The 10’ wide path would be separated from Webster Road by a five foot wide grass strip. The path will cross Chesapeake Drive to Gardenside Lane meeting a crosswalk on the north side of Webster Road. Historic assessments on three houses are proceeding. Construction will occur in coordination with utility companies to move poles. To minimize impact on historic properties the path design will be done in collaboration with VTrans to reduce the 10’ wide path to eight feet and the grass strip to three feet. Alternative routes were looked at to reduce the path’s impact on the Koch house. A 10’ squash culvert 30’ long is proposed for Monroe Brook to allow the path to go over the brook. PUBLIC COMMENT Reese Harris, Gardenside, spoke in support of the proposed design and asked if the Koch’s home across from Acorn Lane is a major stumbling block. Mr. Bohne stated the town must acquire easements along the entire path route. Property owners will be made aware of their rights. Easement acquisition is a negotiating process. The Koch’s concerns about the path in front of their house have been noted. Chris Lathrop explained possible alternatives include moving the Koch house back 35’ which will not affect the historic nature of the house. Another option is for the path to go to the back of their property. Mr. Harris suggested relocating the proposed road crossing farther east at Acorn Lane versus Gardenside for safety and line of sight reasons. Bernie Gagnon pointed out there is a row of cedar trees and an historic house to the north of Gardenside so DuBois & King were not asked to look at that option. There is also a need to minimize the number of driveway crossings. Mr. Harris commented that the traffic pattern in the area and children suggests the proposed crosswalk will be under-utilized due to safety reasons. Ed Bouton, Acorn Lane, expressed concern about the closeness of the path to the front of the Koch-Clark house, suggesting it would be better to move the house back because at some future point Webster Road will need to be widened. There are three major housing developments that feed traffic onto Webster Road which will become a major east-west through route. In response to a question, Mr. Lathrop stated the estimate for constructing the approximately mile long path as proposed is $530,000 ($100 per foot) not including easement costs or moving houses. There was further discussion of the river crossing, required permits for the wetlands from the state wetlands division, the conditional use determination to be pursued by Dubois & King in the next phase of the project, construction funding proposed as an addition to the budget process; and necessary other permits (stream alteration permit for the culvert, Conditional Use, Act 250, and stormwater). The next step is finalizing the path route and final design. Staff is seeking conceptual approval from the Selectboard after which discussion with landowners will begin. H.Wright Caswell, President of the Farmstead Homeowners Association, spoke in support of the project, adding Rob Donahue has done a great job in developing bike paths which he uses to bike to work. The new housing development yields lots of kids (38 children in the neighborhood) and foot traffic on the road. Mr. Caswell mentioned he has had many conversations with the Kochs about the two alternatives for the path by their house, and if the option is to move the house then they want the neighborhood to endorse that option. Mr. Caswell said he will forward the endorsement to the Town Planner. Reese Harris interjected the project as planned is a recreation path, but essentially a sidewalk. Moving a house could set the project back a year or more. A temporary lane could be painted along the existing roadway. The Board should consider all options in the most practical sense. Bill Allen, Boulder Hill, spoke in support of the bike path, noting there are about 58 children in the Boulder Hill development. Webster Road was built during the horse and buggy era, but now cars travel on the road at 35 mph. 6. PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION OF THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Peter Frankenburg, Financial Officer, reviewed the Capital Improvement Plan projected out six years. The plan is updated each year. There is funding for FY07/08. Projects in Year 2 through Year 6 are proposed and subject to correction/adjustments. Funding is by bond vote or budget. Operating costs are not included in the calculations. Projects in the plan are tied to impact fees. Projects must be in the Capital Improvement Plan to adopt an impact fee or used to identify potential new impact fees. The Fire Department and Recreation Field numbers will be revised. The Board was provided with the project list and total costs. Ms. McKnight asked about possible new impact fees. Mr. Frankenburg replied impact fees may be applied for transportation, emergency services, and such. Mr. Talley asked how the FY08/09 project list compared to the FY07/08 funded project list. Page 3 of the Summary was reviewed. Mr. Bohne noted the Wastewater Department will look at issues/concerns related to debt, fee structure and the Aid In Capacity fund relative to user fees. Mr. Talley asked if the data on users versus volume should be reviewed. Bernie Gagnon stated Shelburne is mostly residential versus industrial/commercial. Mr. Bohne stated staff is looking at space and needs assessment for Emergency Services that will address investment that should be made regarding the current facility. Under consideration is a combined fire and rescue facility. Ms. McKnight asked if the town is pursuing regional sharing of emergency services. Mr. Bohne mentioned not all recreation paths on the list will be constructed. Staff will look at segments that should be constructed and financing. Input from the Bike/Pedestrian Committee is needed regarding funding. Rob Donahue noted the paths committee did intend to apply for a grant for the Mount Philo sidewalk, and it is possible to group or bundle projects together. 7. CONSIDER APPOINTMENT OF PERSIS H. WORRALL TO THE SHELBURNE NATURAL RESOURCES COMMITTEE Gail Albert, Shelburne Natural Resources Committee Chair, introduced Persis Worrall and reviewed the candidate’s qualifications. MOTION by Mr. Roesler, seconded by Ms. McKnight, to appoint Persis H. Worrall to the Shelburne Natural Resources Committee for a term to expire in 2009. VOTE: unanimous (4-0); motion carried. 8. CONSIDER APPOINTING FRED SCHMIDT AS THE SHELBURNE REPRESENTATIVE TO THE CHITTENDEN COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY MOTION by Mr. Roesler, seconded by Ms. McKnight, to appoint Fred Schmidt as the Shelburne representative to the Chittenden County Transportation Authority for the balance of an existing three year term. VOTE: unanimous (4-0); motion carried. 9. CONSIDER APPOINTING PAUL BOHNE AS THE ALTERNATE REPRESENTATIVE TO THE CHITTENDEN COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY MOTION by Ms. McKnight, seconded by Mr. Boyd, to appoint the Town Manager, Paul Bohne, as the alternate representative to the Chittenden County Transportation Authority. VOTE: unanimous (4-0); motion carried. 10. CONSIDER APPROVAL OF CURRENT EXPENSE NOTE IN THE AMOUNT OF $12,900 WITH THE CHITTENDEN BANK FOR A TERM OF ONE YEAR, INTEREST RATE OF 3.75%, FOR THE PURCHASE OF A DIGITAL RECORDER FOR THE POLICE DEPARTMENT Mr. Bohne briefly reviewed the list of bids received at the last meeting. Approval of the expense is formal ratification by the Board for purchase of a digital recorder for use by the police department. MOTION by Mr. Roesler, seconded by Mr. Boyd, to approve the current expense note in the amount of $12,900 with the Chittenden Bank for a term of one year, interest rate of 3.75%, for the purchase of a digital recorder for the Police Department. VOTE: unanimous (4-0); motion carried. The Selectboard signed the document. 11. CONSIDER AUTHORIZING THE TOWN MANAGER TO SIGN THE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH THE VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION FOR THE DESIGN OF A SIDEWALK ON MT. PHILO ROAD Mr. Bohne explained that when planning grant money is received the town will enter into a cooperative agreement with VTrans to do an engineering study for a sidewalk on Mt. Philo Road. The estimated cost of the sidewalk is $163,000. The planning grant is $40,800 and the local match is $10,200 for a total cost of $51,000 for the study. MOTION by Mr. Roesler, seconded by Mr. Boyd, to authorize the Town Manager to sign a Cooperative Agreement with the Vermont Agency of Transportation for design of a sidewalk on Mt. Philo Road. VOTE: unanimous (4-0); motion carried. 12. CONSIDER APPROVING THE MINUTES OF October 23, 2007 MOTION by Mr. Roesler, seconded by Mr. Boyd, to approve the minutes of 10/23/2007 as written. VOTE: unanimous (4-0); motion carried. 13. MANAGER’S REPORT Mr. Bohne noted the Users of Sewer Capacity Ordinance must be signed by the Board. 14. MEMBER CONCERNS Ms. McKnight asked about the lease with the Shelburne Art Center. Mr. Bohne reported the Art Center will pay a $1,000 monthly fee during the five year lease. The Art Center is not interested in a graduated payment schedule. 15. ADJOURNMENT MOTION by Mr. Boyd, seconded by Mr. Roesler, to adjourn the regular meeting. VOTE: unanimous (4-0); motion carried. The meeting was adjourned at 9:35 p.m. RScty: K.Furr *****************************************
SELECTBOARDMINUTES OF MEETINGNOVEMBER 27, 2007 MEMBERS PRESENT: Robert Roesler (Chairperson); Bill Smith, Jane McKnight. (Absent: Chris Boyd, Jim Talley) ADMINISTRATION: Paul Bohne, Town Manager; Peter Frankenburg, Financial Officer. OTHERS PRESENT: Rob Donahue, Roger Preis, Ann Clark, Fred Koch, Ross Mohn, Bill Allen, Chris Preston (Shelburne News). 1. CALL TO ORDER Mr. Roesler, Acting Chairperson, called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. 2. CHANGES TO AGENDA None. 3. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION None. 4. DISCUSSION OF THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN AND CONSIDERATION OF WARNING A PUBLIC HEARING Peter Frankenburg, Financial Officer, reviewed the proposed Capital Improvement Plan as follows: · Sidewalks, bike/pedestrian paths, crosswalks, and multi-modal/recreation paths grouped under the Public Works category. · Police Department budget outlines a two-year replacement schedule for three cruisers and replacement of the dispatch console. · Rescue budget includes replacement of an ambulance and defibrillators (defibrillators funded via donations and rescue revenues). · Town Hall vault space improvements. · Recreation budget includes funds to complete Blodgett Field and upgrades to the beach and recreation areas. · Cemetery budget level funded at $5000. · Library has a carry-over from last year. An engineering study will be done relative to future space needs. Next steps include review of the Capital Project List, review of potential impact fee projects, warning a public hearing/adoption of the Capital Improvement Plan, and revisions to current impact fees as necessary. Mr. Frankenburg will forward a copy of the presentation on the Capital Improvement Plan to Ms. McKnight. There was further discussion regarding proposed projects on the project list and impact fees (the Town has six years from collection to implementation of the intended projects/plan; if a project funded with impact fees is eliminated the fees must be refunded). Money used to plan and implement a plan is a legitimate expense. Collected impact fees can be shifted to a new, similar type of project (i.e. funding for a pedestrian path can be shifted to another pedestrian path). The project list creates expectations that a project will be done. Mr. Bohne explained the report estimates the need for the impact fees and creates a standard linked to growth. Impact fees can be assessed for a specific project. Mr. Frankenburg clarified there is one recreation impact fee which is split between two basic categories ($72,000 for field projects and $65,000 for paths as of June 30th). Rob Donahue, Bike/Pedestrian Committee, noted the Webster Road path refers to the Hullcrest to Longmeadow bike/pedestrian connection. Ms. McKnight expressed concern that grant money is not available for path projects, and the Board is receiving negative feedback from residents about the cost of the paths. Ms. McKnight questioned if it is realistic to commit the expenditure for paths in the Capital Plan. Rob Donahue stated not all the letters from residents of Longmeadow and Webster Road were negative. There were more letters in support of the Webster Road segment. The $530,000 construction cost includes $300,000 in grant funding. Mr. Bohne stated currently there is $100,000 in grant funding for an engineering study plus a $300,000 grant and impact fees. Ms. McKnight requested usage figures early in the process for the stretch of path (Webster Road). There are competing priorities such as crumbling bridges. Mr. Bohne pointed out the Paths Committee puts much energy and effort into developing bike and pedestrian paths. The paths are an amenity the town should have. The Capital Improvement Plan outlines a number of projects, including bike and pedestrian paths as well as sidewalks in the FY08-09 and FY09-10 projections, which should be viewed as a package. Ms. McKnight asked if the proposal includes contingencies with respect to three historic houses. Mr. Smith clarified at this juncture the Board needs to decide on the Capital Improvement Plan as presented conceptually, not approval of specific expenditures. Mr. Smith asked if there is a concrete measure of support by the public. Rob Donahue stated at the last Selectboard meeting the meeting room was full and the audience was unanimous in support. The numbers are large, but there are missing (path) segments (for example, it is not known how to complete Segment 5). It was mentioned the path network provides a way for children to get to school. Only one route is needed on Webster Road. Ms. McKnight reiterated the concern about other outstanding needs, such as the repair of bridges on Harbor Road and Bay Road. Peter Frankenburg explained sidewalks and pedestrian paths have been built using 80% grant money. There is $300,000 in an enhancement grant for the Webster Road segment. To get grant money for sidewalks/paths, a project must meet transportation needs. Mr. Smith asked if department heads were asked to justify department needs. Mr. Bohne stated equipment requests from Public Works or the Highway Department are needed. A sinking fund was established to meet department needs. MOTION by Mr. Smith, seconded by Ms. McKnight, to warn a public hearing on 12/18/07 for the proposed Capital Improvement Plan. VOTE: unanimous (3-0); motion carried. 5. CONSIDER APPROVING CONCEPTUAL DESIGN FOR SEGMENT #4, THE WEBSTER ROAD MULTIPURPOSE PATH Mr. Bohne stated two issues of consideration in the design of Segment #4 of the Webster Road multipurpose path include the Acorn Lane crosswalk and impacts to the Koch/Clark house. The design is conceptual and can be revised as necessary. Ms. McKnight asked if the Webster Road path is entirely within the town right-of-way. Mr. Bohne stated there will be a five foot wide grass strip between the road and the 10’ wide path. The path will narrow to eight feet wide by the historic houses. Ann Clark, owner of one of the historic homes, spoke in support of the path, but was appalled that the Town would build a path 15’ from the front door of the house. Other options have been presented to the Bike/Pedestrian Committee, including going around the back of the property. The issue is safety (there have been several car accidents with passengers landing in the front yard). Mr. Bohne confirmed there have been discussions with Fred Koch regarding moving the path. To move the path to the Koch’s backyard will require cooperation from the Farmstead homeowners. Fred Koch said he contacted a foundation specialist. The estimate to move the house back approximately 75’ is $42,000 without excavation or the foundation work. Ms. Clark reiterated her satisfaction with the path being behind the house. Mr. Koch suggested barriers be installed to discourage people from taking shortcuts across the property if the path is to follow the perimeter of the backyard. A common area (on the Farmstead development) was proposed and approved in 2003, but then the Farmstead residents changed their minds. Ross Mohn, Boulder Hill, objected to characterizing Farmstead as not cooperating when nothing has been presented for a vote. Mr. Mohn said he has had conversations with Wright Caswell, Farmstead Association President. Ms. Clark stated there have been conversations to keep the path entirely on her property, not through the Farmstead common area. Mr. Koch noted the common area is a one-acre parcel sold to Farmstead so the development would meet zoning requirements. It is proposed that a small piece of contiguous land with Farmstead be provided as an easement (by Farmstead) to allow the path to curve rather than follow right angles around the perimeter of the backyard. Ms. Clark stressed equity is sought. The path as proposed will be only 15’ from the front door of the house. Mr. Koch noted the lights of cars on Acorn Lane shine in the windows now. The road could have been designed to go east if it had been built out straight instead of veering as it does. Mr. Bohne assured the Town will make every effort not to put a crosswalk in front of the Koch house. Mr. Bohne also noted that Matt Wormser’s house (a.k.a the Joshua Reed house) and the Koch/Clark house are the historic homes impacted by the proposed path. Next steps include moving forward with the concept and the categorical exclusion (CE) process and then beginning formal negotiations with each property owner to acquire easements. Moving the house could be a qualified cost. MOTION by Ms. McKnight, seconded by Mr. Smith, to approve the conceptual design for Segment #4, the Webster Road multipurpose path, contingent upon achieving satisfactory resolution of impacts to the Righi, Wormser, and Koch/Clark residences as identified at the 11/27/2007 Selectboard meeting as well as any other contingency that may arise. VOTE: unanimous (3-0); motion carried. 6. CONSIDER APPROVING REQUEST FOR SEWER ALLOCATION OF 420 GPD BY DENNIS DEMERS FOR TWO LOTS ON BISHOP ROAD Mr. Bohne explained the request by Dennis Demers for sewer allocation for two lots on Bishop Road. Technically the Demers lots are outside the sewer service district. Mr. Demers has a vested interest in sewer allocation through a 1992 commitment. MOTION by Mr. Smith, seconded by Ms. McKnight, to approve the request for sewer allocation of 420 gpd by Dennis Demers for two lots located on Bishop Road. VOTE: unanimous (3-0); motion carried. 7. CONSIDER WAIVING THE PENALTY FOR LATE PAYMENT OF PROPERTY TAXES FOR THE ESTATE OF FRANK O’BRIEN MOTION by Ms. McKnight, seconded by Mr. Smith, to waive the penalty for late payment of property taxes for the estate of Frank O’Brien. VOTE: unanimous (3-0); motion carried. 8. DISCUSSION OF A CODE OF ETHICS POLICY FOR PUBLIC OFFICIALS AND EMPLOYEES Mr. Bohne stated the proposed Code of Ethics Policy covers both public officials and town employees. The policy was crafted so each section could be separated into a distinct policy. Ms. McKnight suggested tabling action to allow more thorough review of the proposed policy and to hear from the absent board members. Examples should be provided in the policy, added Ms. McKnight. Mr. Smith felt the policy is clear on what can and cannot be done. A signature line for officials/employees to indicate they have read and agreed to the policy was suggested. Mr. Bohne said staff will include the policy on the 12/11/07 meeting agenda. 9. CONSIDER APPROVAL FOR THE TOWN TO PARTICIPATE IN THE LOCAL UPDATE OF CENSUS ADDRESSES (LUCA) Mr. Bohne reviewed the memo from the Town Planner regarding a town designee working with the Census early in the process. MOTION by Mr. Smith, seconded by Ms. McKnight, to approve the participation of the Town of Shelburne in the Local Update of Census Addresses (LUCA) as presented. VOTE: unanimous (3-0); motion carried. 10. CONSIDER APPROVING THE MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 13, 2007 Approval of the 11/13/2007 Board minutes was deferred until the next meeting. 11. MANAGER’S REPORT Mr. Bohne announced the annual Christmas Tree lighting event on Friday, 11/30/2007, at 6:00 p.m. Santa will arrive at Town Hall as well. 12. MEMBER CONCERNS Mr. Smith commented the replacement tree on the Pierson Town Green is beautiful. 13. EXECUTIVE SESSION and/or ADJOURNMENT MOTION by Ms. McKnight, seconded by Mr. Smith, to adjourn the regular meeting and enter Executive Session for the purpose of discussing litigation matters, and to invite the Town Manager to attend. VOTE: unanimous (3-0); motion carried. The regular meeting was adjourned and Executive Session convened at 8:40 p.m. RScty: K.Furr
January 2007Selectboard Meeting Minutes February 2007 Selectboard Meeting Minutes March 2007 Selectboard Meeting Minutes April 2007 Selectboard Meeting Minutes May 2007 Selectboard Meeting Minutes June 2007 Selectboard Meeting Minutes July 2007 Selectboard Meeting Minutes August 2007 Selectboard Meeting Minutes September 2007 Selectboard Meeting Minutes October 2007 Selectboard Meeting Minutes November 2007 Selectboard Meeting Minutes December 2007 Selectboard Meeting Minutes |
|
|
|
Home | Contacts | Departments | Events | Information | Search | Site Map | Services | Forms | Minutes
Site by DIGITAL FRONTIER © 2008 |
