    |
  |
        |
|
|
May 2006
SELECTBOARD MINUTES OF MEETNG MAY 9, 2006 MEMBERS PRESENT: Chris Neme, Chairperson; Jim Talley, Jane McKnight, (Chris Boyd and Robert Roesler were absent.) ADMINISTRATION: Paul Bohne, Town Manager; Dean Pierce, Town Planner; Steve Stitzel, Town Attorney. OTHERS PRESENT: Hilda White, Maria Horn, Tom Ward, Ellin London, Fritz Horton, Rick Peterson, Mary Luxton-Jones, Chris Preston (Shelburne News), and others. EXECUTIVE SESSION – PERSONNEL AND LITIGATION The Selectboard met in Executive Session at 6 p.m. to discuss personnel and litigation matters. 1. CALL TO ORDER (regular meeting) Chris Neme, Chairperson, called the regular meeting to order at 7:07 p.m. 2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA There were no changes. 3. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION None. 4. PUBLIC HEARING: PROPOSED TOWN PLAN Rick Peterson, Chairman of the Shelburne Planning Commission, explained the process for revising the Town Plan. Dean Pierce, Town Planner, gave an overview of the draft 2006 Town Plan that included background information, town survey results/findings, statutory requirements, major elements of the new draft (Volume I and Volume II), significant changes and additions, map changes, and policy recommendations. Jim Talley asked about enforcement relative to the number of affordable housing units. Mr. Pierce replied the zoning bylaws provide enforcement while the Town Plan sets goals for housing. Mr. Talley observed the word “shall” is a requirement and the word “should” is a goal. Mr. Neme asked if the draft Town Plan creates a legal “hook”. Mr. Peterson stated the Planning Commission discussed the issue and tried to keep it mandatory. If the number of affordable units falls short of the Town Plan goals, then the developer could be told he can absorb the number of affordable units. It has been difficult to reach the 10% balance. Ms. McKnight asked if the boundary of the Village Center crosses Route 7 on the maps. Mr. Pierce replied the Village Core area follows the railroad tracks western most to Railroad Lane. The Shelburne Museum asked that museum land west of the railroad track be the same as the Museum Industrial District which is outside of the Village Core area. The Planning Commission endorsed the request as parallel to the plan. Shelburne Falls Road area is more difficult since it is more commercial with historic resources. There has been discussion of growth slowed down due to lack of sewer capacity. Only one of three big projects is on line. New factors/patterns are coming related to the development of Shelburnewood, the reconstruction of the Route 7 corridor, and the potential for senior housing. Fritz Horton stated the new zoning ordinance is an issue in the Lakeshore Overlay District, specifically the 200’ setback from the lakeshore versus 100’ setback in relation to noncomplying structures (90% of existing structures will become noncomplying). Mr. Pierce pointed out the Overlay zone is lakeshore that goes back 500’ from the 102’ high water benchmark. One change is 98’ versus 102’. Mr. Horton commented that 102’ or 98’ is virtually the same, rendering existing residences nonconforming. Mr. Peterson noted language appears on Volume I, page 27, adding the increase of buffer to 200’, exclusive of Shelburne Bay, should be discussed further. Mr. Talley commented the plan might not be the problem. Zoning may be out of sync with the Town Plan. Mr. Pierce clarified 102’ is high water flood stage, 93.5’ is a low water mark, the median number is 98’. There are complicating factors in deed language (93’-95’ is in the “public trust” realm). Ellin London, resident, asked if there is the possibility of limiting the size or cost of new houses. Mr. Pierce replied the Town Plan does not put a cap on house size to tie into affordability. There is language on energy (Page 57) that will impact large residences. Ms. McKnight asked if the Planning Commission considered controlling house size. Mr. Peterson said the Planning Commission discussed design control, which would require a design study. Ms. McKnight asked if control can be done arithmetically, and expressed concern about “walls of windows.” Maria Horn stated she lives in an area where there is still some acreage, and there is concern that someone can tear down an existing structure and rebuild a large house (mansion). Mr. Neme noted the issue could be addressed through “character of the neighborhood”, impacts of energy and offsets, and regulation of the number of affordable housing. Mr. Pierce stated it is getting more difficult to regulate “character of the neighborhood”. The plan has language to develop zoning bylaws, and there is policy language in the Town Plan with regard to rural areas. Mr. Talley added a definition is needed of “impact” (something that would have undue adverse impacts, such as VELCO). Ms. Horn asked that the public hearings be better advertised. The hearing on the draft Town Plan was continued to the 06/13/2006 Selectboard meeting. Comments should be forwarded to Dean Pierce. 5. CONSIDER ACCEPTING SEWER AND WATER MAINS IN THE CHESAPEAKE SUBDIVISION AND ACCEPTING CHESAPEAKE DRIVE Mr. Bohne explained the sewer and water mains are a part of a 1996 project. The Public Works Department is satisfied with the quality of utilities so the Town will accept the utilities and road. The Agency of Natural Resources has investigated a partial fill-in of some wetlands in the open space area. The Town is not the recorded owner of the open space and it is recommended the open space not be accepted at this time. The project will remain open until the punch list is completed. Mr. Neme asked if there is a system in place to alert staff when the warranty period ends. Mr. Pierce mentioned the database used to track items, such as utilities. MOTION by Mr. Talley, seconded by Ms. McKnight, to accept the sewer and water mains in the Utility Phase and to accept Chesapeake Drive as presented. VOTE: unanimous (3-0); motion carried. 6. CONSIDER AMENDING THE CARE AND CONTROL OF DOGS ORDINANCE BY CHANGING HOURS OF OPERATION OF THE KENNEL AND BOARDING FEES (First Reading) Mr. Bohne reported the Police Chief has recommended changes to sections of the Dog Ordinance. A complete ordinance will be forwarded to the Selectboard. Proposed changes and issues for consideration will be discussed. It is suggested scheduling a First Reading at a future meeting. Proposed changes to the kennel hours reflect hours stated in the ordinance. Current fees do not cover costs. The 1995 animal control ordinance covers dogs, cats, and wolf-hybrids. The ordinance prohibits cats and dogs at Shelburne Beach. The Recreation Committee requested retaining the beach clause. There was discussion of the “no dogs” rule in municipal/public buildings due to health and safety issues (dog training classes are exempt), the request by the pound keeper to be an enforcement officer (the Board suggested deleting Section 2.f, definition of Enforcement Officer, from the ordinance), and the suggestion that a federal service animal information sheet would be useful. Mary Luxton-Jones, resident, said she brings her dogs to Town Hall when she conducts business, such as paying dog license fees, adding her dogs are better behaved than most children and the Town staff likes seeing the dogs. Ms. Luxton-Jones asked about the reasoning for Section 4. Mr. Bohne explained there are incidents where a person could lose control of their animal. The language comes from a model provided by the State Attorney’s Office. Mr. Horton noted he has brought his dog into Town Hall upon request. The solution could be a compromise where a dog with a certain level of obedience training or socialization is allowed in municipal buildings. Regulating ourselves by a “worst case” scenario is unfortunate, stated Mr. Horton. 7. CONSIDER AMENDING THE PARKING ORDINANCE TO ELIMINATE CONTROL OF FIRE LANES AND CREATE A NEW ORDINANCE CONTROLLING FIRE LANES Mr. Bohne reported the draft ordinance is not yet complete. Staff is considering removing the parking ordinance from the traffic ordinance. How to administer appeals is an issue. One suggestion is to have Selectboard members rotate on an appeal board. It is unclear if parking fines should be an option. Steve Stitzel, Town Attorney, advised the Selectboard can appoint a panel or volunteers can be appointed as a qualified appeal board. Members must be available 24-hours a day and would handle towing issues. Case law for a “wrongfully towed” vehicle provides that a person is entitled to an immediate hearing. In Burlington, a city employee is appointed to deal with towing cases. Mr. Neme asked about a car parked in a fire lane. Attorney Stitzel replied any towing zone must be marked with a separate sign. Staff will redraft the Parking Ordinance for Board consideration at the next meeting. The appeal body section will be left as an appointment by the Selectboard. Sue Fallon, resident, stated people parking vehicles on sidewalks, especially on Falls Road, is an issue. Enforcement is needed. Mr. Bohne stated law enforcement officers deal with the matter. Maria Horn suggested fines be assessed to people who acquire three or more tickets in a specified time period. Ms. McKnight suggested using a “Denver Boot”. 8. CONSIDER AMENDING THE TOWN OF SHELBURNE INVESTMENT POLICY Mr. Bohne explained the Town Clerk is the designated Investment Officer per the Town policy, but currently out of town so it is suggested postponing action until the clerk’s return. 9. CONSIDER APPROVAL OF LIQUOR LICENSE The Selectboard signed the liquor license (Shelburne Beverage) as presented. 10. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF APRIL 11 and 25, 2006 Approval of the minutes of 04/11/2006 and 04/25/2006 was tabled until the next meeting. 11. MANAGER’S REPORT Mr. Bohne asked that the Selectboard re-sign the Citizen’s Bank note for the purchase of equipment (note has the corrected date). The Board signed the document. The Selectboard signed the Town Service Officer document appointing the Town Manager as the Town Service Officer. 12. MEMBER CONCERNS None. 13. EXECUTIVE SESSION MOTION by Mr. Talley, seconded by Ms. McKnight, to recess the regular meeting and to enter Executive Session for the purpose of discussing litigation matters, and to invite the Town Manager and Town Attorney to attend. VOTE: unanimous (3-0); motion carried. The Board recessed the regular meeting and entered Executive Session at 9:30 p.m. The Board adjourned Executive Session and reconvened the meeting at p.m. 14. ADJOURNMENT MOTION by , seconded by , to adjourn the meeting. VOTE: unanimous; motion carried. The meeting adjourned at p.m. Minutes respectfully submitted by Kathlyn Furr, Recording Secretary. Accepted, Chris Neme Selectboard Chair
SELECTBOARD MINUTES OF MEETNG MAY 23, 2006 MEMBERS PRESENT: Jim Talley; Chris Boyd, Jane McKnight, Robert Roesler (Chris Neme was absent.) ADMINISTRATION: Paul Bohne, Town Manager; Peter Frankenburg, Financial Officer; Dean Pierce, Town Planner; Bernie Gagnon, Public Works Director; Colleen Haag, Town Clerk. OTHERS PRESENT: Robert White, Sue McLellan, Michael Momaney, Cheryl Roberts, Bill Hoadley, Marty Illick, Marilene Luxton-Jones, Chris Preston (Shelburne News); Ashley Mathews (Burlington Free Press); and others. 1. CALL TO ORDER Jim Talley, Acting Chairperson, called the meeting to order at 7:01 p.m. 2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Approval of the Minutes (Item #17) moved up to follow Citizen Participation (Item #3). 3. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION None. 3b) APPROVAL OF MINUTES April 11, 2006 MOTION by Mr. Roesler, seconded by Ms. McKnight, to approve the minutes of 04/11/2006 as written. VOTE: 3 ayes, 1 abstention (Mr. Talley); motion carried. April 25, 2006 MOTION by Ms. McKnight, seconded by Mr. Roesler, to approve the minutes of 04/25/2006 as written with the following correction: Page 3, 2nd motion - change to read: “…appoint Gail Henderson-King…to the Bike and Pedestrian Committee…”. VOTE: 3 ayes, 1 abstention (Mr. Talley); motion carried. May 9, 2006 Approval of the 5/9/06 minutes was tabled. 4. CONSIDER DRAFT REPORT OF THE VILLAGE PLAN Mr. Bohne introduced Robert White with Robert White Associates who presented the draft Village Plan. Any changes/comments will be incorporated into the document. Mr. White stated the plan emphasizes major physical improvements to the existing village. Major sections of the pedestrian-friendly village include:
· Marsett Road has low-key issues mitigated by narrowing and a carry over of green space. · At the Marsett/Falls Road intersection, a crosswalk would “crisp-up” movement at the four-way stop. · A splitter island west of the Falls Road Bridge is suggested. Concern was expressed about traveling uphill west off the bridge into the sun and not seeing the island. Mr. White will review the area again. Mr. White said costs blended a variety of funding sources to create unit prices. The contingency amount could be bumped. The Town should increase costs for inflation. Mr. Boyd asked about a roundabout at the Route 7/Harbor Road/Falls Road intersection. Mr. White stated a roundabout would involve major property acquisitions (Mobile gas station on the west side and property on the east side). The issue is complex and expensive. Ms. McKnight asked for clarification of proposed traffic calming measures to address congestion in the village, expressing concern traffic calming will “calm” traffic to a dead stop. Mr. White pointed out drivers get used to the elements and accommodate for them in their driving patterns. For example, on North Avenue in Burlington there is street level corduroy pavement which brings traffic speeds down to about 18 mph which is a safer speed than 30 mph. Route 7 is a federal highway. Crosswalks on some local streets can be elevated and 10 mph speeds would be guaranteed. ‘Smart Mobility’ has a computer model that can generate an analysis of how traffic calming affects speed. Sue McLellan, resident, expressed concern about changes dramatically impacting the village area itself. Mr. White stated the look and feel of historical streets would be reclaimed (with the narrowing of streets and slowing of traffic). Along Falls Road there can be pedestrian access, on-street parking, and even an increase in the amount of parking. The Board will review the report and forward comments to the Town Planner. 5. CONSIDER LETTER OF INTENT FOR 2007 ENHANCEMENT GRANT APPLICATION Dean Pierce, Town Planner, explained the letter of intent (general until the results of the study done by Jim Donavan are received). The grant application will be submitted in August. MOTION by Mr. Roesler, seconded by Ms. McKnight, to approve the draft letter in preparation of an enhancement grant application to the State of Vermont and to authorize the Town Manager to sign the letter on behalf of the Town. VOTE: unanimous (4-0); motion carried. 6. PROGRESS REPORT AND DISCUSSION OF THE SHELBURNEWOOD DEVELOMENT WITH MIKE MOMANEY OF HOUSING FOUNDATION, INC. Mike Momaney, Housing Foundation, Inc. (HFI), appeared on behalf of the proposed Shelburnewood development. Mr. Momaney brought the Board up to date on activities, noting the project is back on track and the environmental issues have been resolved. Information will be available over the next six weeks. Shelburnewood tenants have been briefed on preliminary concepts of what the park will look like. HFI will redevelop the park and will sell it to the tenants if they so desire. Most of the existing park infrastructure needs replacement. An elderly housing component is proposed as part of the redevelopment. HFI would like to see some higher end market sections to subsidize the park. The first application for Community Development funds is targeted for late July. Timelines for the purchase of the park and financing are still compatible. The closure date is important. It is also important to stay on track. Mr. Momaney thanked the Town for assistance with the project. Mr. Bohne noted the Town as the applicant for a successful $30,000 Block Community Development Program grant. 7. CONSIDER SUPPORTING REQUEST FOR USE OF SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECT (SEP) GRANT FUNDS Mr. Bohne reported the Town entered into an Assurance of Discontinuance with the Agency of Natural Resources (ANR) due to an issue of overflows in 2005. There is an option to put the (fine) money into escrow and fund Supplemental Environmental Projects (SEP) in Shelburne. The ANR keeps a list of projects (such as stream bank restoration as a project). Projects need the support of both the Selectboard and ANR. Bill Hoadley reviewed the LaPlatte watershed project in Shelburne. The Lewis Creek Watershed Association (LCA) and the LaPlatte Watershed Partnership have worked collaboratively on a three-phase activity to gather water quality data and fluvial geomorphic assessments. The project will look at the stream movement process, flows, and changes in the stream to understand and guide stream corridor management, reduce erosion and flooding. The state is requiring the partnership to prepare samples, buy supplies, and bring samples to the state lab. Mr. Bohne asked who is responsible for the purchased equipment (Lewis Creek Association or the Town). The state requires funds to funnel through a 501(c)(3) organization. Both grants go through the LCA. Mr. Hoadley said LCA will continue activities. It is expected some members of the Conservation Commission will get involved. It is not clear if the state will have an opinion on where the equipment resides or who uses it. MOTION by Mr. Roesler, seconded by Mr. Boyd, to support the requirement of the Supplemental Environmental Projects Grant funds for the Lewis Creek Watershed Association for stream water mapping and water quality sampling as outlined in a letter from Martha Illick, dated 05/16/2006. DISCUSSION: Ms. McKnight asked about the completion date of the project. Ms. Illick, LCA, replied the project is one year (Page 5 - Scope of Work). Mr. Hoadley stated the project is an analysis of how the stream is reacting to human activity. Ms. Illick explained Phase I results are somewhat adjusted. Phase II information will be helpful for a management plan and prioritization. Phase III is a detailed survey for a sophisticated restoration project. VOTE: unanimous (4-0); motion carried. 8. CONSIDER AMENDING ORDINANCE FOR THE CARE AND CONTROL OF ANIMALS (First Reading) Mr. Bohne explained the format of the ordinance is drafted per the Town Attorney’s advice. There was discussion of dog owners bringing their animals into municipal buildings, and the problem this poses for people with allergies and such. Exceptions are service animals (seeing-eye dogs and such). There was also discussion of Section 9 – Enforcement on Private Property which addresses nuisance animals or unrestrained animals that return to the owner’s property. The ordinance allows enforcement officer to enter private property. Ms. McLellan, resident, spoke in favor of no dogs allowed inside municipal buildings if there are allergy issues. Ms. McLellan also commented on ordinances not being enforced. Colleen Haag, Town Clerk, acknowledged the Town Attorney’s concerns, but in her experience as Town Clerk for the past 24 years, dog licenses are issued along with a dog bone as part of customer service. There have been no issues related to allergies or dogs being too rambunctious. Ms. Haag stated she is not aware of any problems with dogs coming into the town office. Marilene Luxton -Jones, resident, questioned the issue with bringing a dog inside a municipal building (large space) when a dog is allowed on a plane (more confined space). Ms. Luxton-Jones also questioned the rationale for the section of the ordinance pertaining to female dogs in heat being outside, noting if the leash law is enforced, there should not be a problem. MOTION by Mr. Roesler, seconded by Ms. McKnight, to table consideration of amending the Ordinance for the Care and Control of Animals until the next meeting. VOTE: unanimous (4-0); motion carried. 9. CONSIDER AMENDING THE TOWN INVESTMENT POLICY Ms. Haag reviewed various investment funds held by the town departments (Library, Cemetery, Rescue), noting an annuity option for the Rescue Department paying 7.9% and issued through Jackson National Life in Montpelier, and licensed by the Banking and Industry agency (not the same as a Treasury bill or FDIC). The Town Treasurer will manage the fund, but cannot invest funds unless there is a change in the language of the Town investment policy. In response to Board questions, Ms. Haag explained that there are no quarterly financial reports of investment activity. The investment funds are a part of the Financial Officer’s (FO) annual financial report. A report can be done on the rate of return. In making financial decisions, there is dialog between the FO and Town Treasurer on how much is invested or if there is a loan. The Town Treasurer must follow state statutes with regard to investments. Shelburne’s Investment Policy was enacted in 2001. Ms. McKnight noted that an annuity insurance company is not subject to the same level of scrutiny by the SEC. Insurance illustrations and projections do not have to be true. It is of concern there is no FDIC backup. Ms. McKnight questioned if 7.5% for seven years is too good to be true and if Jackson National Life is a reputable firm. Ms. Haag assured the Board that she is conservative with the Town’s money. Mr. Bohne pointed out that annuities generally have penalties for withdrawal of funds before maturity. Also, the funds are not readily available. Annuities may not be prudent investments for a municipality. There was further discussion of Town investments, whether private expert advice was sought (Ms. Haag replied no) or if the Town Auditor can provide advice (it was noted the role of an auditor is to ensure town investments are collateralized), and whether the Vermont League of Cities and Towns or the state could be consulted regarding investment advice. The Selectboard took no action to amend the Town Investment Policy at this time. 10. CONSIDER ADOPTING SEWER BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2007 Mr. Bohne noted the Board can adopt the draft FY06-07 Sewer budget now or at the June 13, 2006 meeting. The Water Commission is discussing a rate structure including adjusting minimum bill charges. Peter Frankenburg stated the new rate will take effect for the Enterprise Fund with bills issued in August. A profile of the current system was reviewed. An estimated 145 million gallons are budgeted for the year (reduction from the FY 05-06 budget) There is a drop in septage revenue because other treatment plants are now accepting septage. Savings this year include the sludge cost and other miscellaneous variable costs. Mr. Frankenburg explained residential and commercial usage has dropped off. The reason why is not known. Gallons billed have dropped, however, gallons processed have increased. This could be due to infiltration, sump pumps or other inflows. It was noted lower flows will extend plant capacity. Mr. Bohne reported a fifth full-time person was hired due to the workload. Managing 20 pump stations has been an issue in the past. The Town wants a Public Works Department with multi-skilled personnel. The state felt Shelburne was understaffed to maintain the system. The fifth person will be utilized by other town departments for efficiencies. Mr. Frankenburg noted there has been a 10% decrease in overtime and double-time hours budgeted for next year, which is a savings. The collection system maintenance line item is up $20,000. Bernie Gagnon explained this relates to manholes. Manholes are maintained on an “as needed” basis. Department personnel respond to pump station failures and do routine maintenance. There is not an active program to replace manholes. The SCADA system maintenance is computer controlled. The computers need to be replaced. Mr. Frankenburg reviewed revenues, user fees (up $58,000), and the use of sewer capacity fees to partially pay debt service and to stabilize the sewer rate. The average customer’s annual bill, for using 70,000 gallons, is $539. The Board will forward comments/questions on the budget to Mr. Frankenburg prior to the next meeting. Mr. Roesler left the meeting. 11. CONSIDER APPROVAL OF ONE YEAR CAPITAL EQUIPMENT LOAN WITH CITIZENS BANK IN THE AMOUNT OF $95,000 AT A RATE OF 3.95 PERCENT FOR PURCHASE OF A HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT DUMP TRUCK MOTION by Mr. Boyd, seconded by Ms. McKnight, to approve the one-year Capital Equipment Loan with Citizens Bank in the amount of $95,000 at a rate of 3.95 percent for the purchase of a Highway Department dump truck as presented. VOTE unanimous (3-0); motion carried. The Board signed the loan document. 12. CONSIDER APPOINTMENT TO THE BIKE/PEDISTRIAN PATH COMMITTEE Action tabled until the next Board meeting. 13. CONSIDER APPOINTMENT OF REPRESENTATIVE TO THE CHITTENDEN COUNTY METROPOLITAN TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE MOTION by Mr. Boyd, seconded by Ms. McKnight, to appoint the Public Works Director as the Shelburne representative to the Chittenden County Metropolitan Technical Advisory Committee for a two-year term. VOTE unanimous (3-0); motion carried. 14. CONSIDER NAMING ROAD: WITCH HAZEL ROAD MOTION by Ms. McKnight, seconded by Mr. Boyd, to approve naming a road “Witch Hazel Road” as presented. VOTE unanimous (3-0); motion carried. 15. CONSIDER AMENDING THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE TOWNS OF SHELBURNE AND CHARLOTTE re: Water Supply from Shelburne to a Charlotte Property Mr. Bohne gave a brief history of the situation involving supplying water to property in Charlotte. The water rights belong to one of two lots. The lots were recently sold and the new owner would like to switch the water service from one lot to another. The Charlotte Selectboard and the Shelburne Water Commission have agreed this is a reasonable request. The Shelburne Selectboard must sign the amendment to change the service. Ms. McKnight asked for clarification regarding the change in lot ownership, lot boundaries, and such, since there is not a site plan along with the request. Staff will provide a site plan. 16. CONSIDER APPROVAL OF LIQUOR LICENSES The Selectboard signed liquor license(s) documents for the Heart of the Village Inn. 17. MANAGER’S REPORT Mr. Bohne read a letter related to a grant application through the CCMPO Sidewalk Program, noting the 20% local share is included in the 2007 budget. MOTION by Mr. Boyd, seconded by Ms. McKnight, to approve the CCMPO Sidewalk Program grant application as presented. VOTE unanimous (3-0); motion carried. 18. MEMBER CONCERNS None. 19. EXECUTIVE SESSION MOTION by Ms. McKnight, seconded by Mr. Boyd, to recess the regular meeting and enter Executive Session for the purpose of discussing litigation matters. VOTE: unanimous (3-0); motion carried. The regular meeting was recessed and the Board entered Executive Session at 10:10 p.m. Executive Session was adjourned and the regular meeting reconvened at 10:34 p.m. 20. ADJOURNMENT MOTION by Mr. Boyd, seconded by Ms. McKnight, to adjourn the meeting. VOTE: unanimous (3-0); motion carried. The meeting adjourned at 10:35 p.m. Minutes respectfully submitted by Kathlyn Furr, Recording Secretary. Accepted, For the Selectboard
January 2006Selectboard Meeting Minutes February 2006 Selectboard Meeting Minutes March 2006 Selectboard Meeting Minutes April 2006 Selectboard Meeting Minutes May 2006 Selectboard Meeting Minutes June 2006 Selectboard Meeting Minutes July 2006 Selectboard Meeting Minutes August 2006 Selectboard Meeting Minutes September 2006 Selectboard Meeting Minutes October 2006 Selectboard Meeting Minutes November 2006 Selectboard Meeting Minutes December 2006 Selectboard Meeting Minutes |
|
|
|
Home | Contacts | Departments | Events | Information | Search | Site Map | Services | Forms | Minutes
Site by DIGITAL FRONTIER © 2008 |
