Selectboard Meeting Minutes

TOWN OF SHELBURNE SELECTBOARD
MEETING MINUTES
OCTOBER 14, 2003

MEMBERS PRESENT: Steve Dates, Chairperson; Steve Good, Jim Dudley, George Faris, Norm Silcox.

STAFF PRESENT: Paul Bohne, Town Manger; Peter Frankenburg, Financial Officer.

OTHERS PRESENT: Dorothea Penar, Joyce Errecart, Emily Morrow, Robert Furrer, Bill Rockford, Dick Reid, George Schiavone, Jim Limanek.

1. EXECUTIVE SESSION The Board entered Executive Session at 6:30 p.m. for the purpose of discussing contracts and litigation where premature knowledge would place the Town at a disadvantage, and invited the Town Manager to attend. Executive Session was adjourned at 7:10 p.m.

2. CALL TO ORDER (regular meeting) Mr. Dates, Chairperson, called the regular meeting to order at 7:10 p.m. and introduced the Board members.

3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Changes to the agenda were as follows: Add Item 10a - Road Name Request .

4. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION There were no comments

5. REPORT FROM VELCO Ad Hoc COMMITTEE Emily Morrow, VELCO Ad Hoc Committee Chairperson, reported on committee progress. Ms. Morrow passed out a third draft Request of Questions/Answers to the Board for review by the Board and Town Attorney. The list of formal written questions must be filed with VELCO for answers by 10/22/03. The committee of ten (includes members with electrical engineering, mechanical engineering, landscaping, environmental science expertise, and residents) met with Richard Sedano regarding requirements for Public Service approval and proceedings. It was suggested talking to the Public Service Board about Town concerns and issues. Jenny Cole, Charlotte Selectboard member and Charlotte VELCO Committee Chairperson, also attended the Ad Hoc Committee meetings and explained the issues in Charlotte. Aerial photographs of the Shelburne area were taken. There was lengthy discussion regarding the proposed list of 72 questions, health and public safety issues that included EMF levels, a 115 kv line versus a 34 kv currently, an estimated budget of $128 million for the proposed VELCO upgrade of which it would cost $2 million to bury lines in Shelburne, a proposal by the committee to hire Michael Keller as consultant to conduct a marketing study of high voltage transmission lines on towns like Shelburne relative to real estate sales/property values, private contributions to fund the proposed marketing study (the committee had raised $13,000 of the estimated $20,000 for the study), Board concerns that the consultant would not be able to provide data for a similar community like Shelburne (Ms. Morrow said that if a similar situation was not found, then the study would not be done), and a 12/17/03 deadline to submit pre-filed testimony (the formal questions) to the Public Service Board. Ms. Morrow handed out copies of articles regarding EMF research/studies and related property tax base impacts. Ms. Morrow suggested asking Mr. Keller to present data at the Pubic Service Board hearing. Mr. Dates suggested that the list of 72 questions be pared down. A committee composed of Mr. Dates, Mr. Silcox, and Ms. Errecart would meet to edit the list for review by the Town Attorney, then for submittal to the Public Service Board. In response to a Board question regarding tax deductible funding for the proposed marketing study, Mr. Bohne explained that if the private donations were deposited in a Town escrow account, the contribution could be tax deductible, however, contributors should consult with their own tax accountant. Ms. Morrow said that if the study was not done, then the funds would be returned to the contributors. Mr. Silcox noted that the Town could conduct a ‘mini’ study regarding economic impacts to homes along the VELCO line. Ms. Morrow explained that in litigation condemnation cases the court must allow EMF level testimony as evidence in determining adverse impacts on property values. Potential litigation was a first step. Ms. Morrow said the next meeting of the committee was scheduled for Wednesday, 10/22/03, at the Magic Hat Brewery at 2:30 p.m. MOTION by Mr. Silcox, seconded by Mr. Faris, to authorize the VELCO Ad Hoc Committee to engage Michael Keller as an independent consultant to develop a marketing study regarding potential impacts to property values related to the placement of high voltage lines in the Town of Shelburne, and estimate the effect on property values along the corridor using appropriate Shelburne matching community(s), and further, that the cost of the study is to be funded through private donations. DISCUSSION: Ms. Morrow asked if it was permissible to use the $2,500 allocated to the committee as part of the study funding. Mr. Silcox replied the $2,500 was for committee work only. Ms. Morrow asked if the Charlotte VELCO Committee could share cost of the study. Mr. Dates advised that it would be better to have separate studies, but perhaps Charlotte could engage Mr. Keller separately. Mr. Silcox spoke in favor of a study that could generate factors to apply to properties along the VECLO corridor for property assessments. Mr. Dudley said the nature of line is a factor – if it was a 115 kV, or 340 kV line. Bob Furrer, Shelburne Museum representative, read a position statement from the Museum’s Board of Trustees. The Museum Board was opposed to the upgrade as currently designed with 61-foot poles, which would be obtrusive to the Museum campus. A copy of the statement would be provided to the Selectboard and VELCO Ad Hoc Committee. Mr. Dudley asked if overhead or buried lines would be considered in the proposed study. CALL THE QUESTION by Mr. Dates. Discussion ceased. VOTE: 4 ayes, 1 nay (Mr. Dudley); motion carried. Mr. Dudley said he was not against a study, but he would want something more solid.

6. DISCUSSION OF STREET LIGHTING POLICY Mr. Bohne explained that operational costs for streetlights were borne by the Town. The placement cost was usually borne by a developer. If there was an existing pole, then Green Mountain Power would put up a light at no capital cost. Green Mountain Power was asked to provide an inventory of all streetlights Shelburne was billed for. A list could not be provided at this time. Mr. Bohne said the Town had received a request by the Farmstead neighborhood for a streetlight. The Town has no policy regarding streetlights at this time, and requests could have significant financial impacts on the Town. Jim Limanek, Fieldstone resident and neighborhood representative, noted that the Farmstead/Fieldstone area loses light earlier due to a hill. At the time the development was built there were concerns regarding light pollution and no lights were installed. Now 78 percent of residents (12 out of 14) were in favor of a street light for safety reasons. The neighborhood position was that they would pay for the service through property taxes. Mr. Dates said it would be a topic that all the taxpayers of Shelburne should have input on. Mr. Faris suggested that the Town Planner research to see if a suburban street lighting plan exists. Mr. Dates said first staff would need to define the issue, understand the scope and limits, and what the impacts were. A question was is it a Town policy issue, asked Mr. Dates. Mr. Bohne said staff would look at a RPC study/policy. Staff would need more guidance before starting. Mr. Bohne noted that where there were streetlights on existing utility poles, the installation was paid for by abutting property owners. The issues could be taken up as Selectboard topic in January, which would give the Town Planner time to research and formulate a policy. Further discussions with Green Mountain Power could occur in November regarding street light issues.

7. LEGISLATIVE DISCUSSION WITH JOYCE ERRECART AND GEORGE SCHIAVONE Joyce Errecart and George Schiavone, Vermont House Representatives, reviewed upcoming legislative topics that included VELCO concerns related to rules/policies to address issues on a state or local level, the County tax assessment process, which was under judiciary control (Ms. Errecart would contact Tom Crowley), Act 60 related to education quality and cost containment (Selectboard concerns included unfunded educational mandates and a cost prohibitive proposed pre-kindergarten program), and CCMPO versus Legislative control over AOT transportation planning issues. Ms. Errecart requested examples of unfunded educational mandates. Mr. Silcox would forward examples. It was suggested that a Legislative update become a regular agenda item every 6 weeks.

8. RESOLUTON TO ACCEPT THE GRANT AGREEMENT FROM THE VCDP FOR THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT MOTION by Mr. Silcox, seconded by Mr. Dudley, to authorize the Town Manager to sign the resolution in which the Town agrees to accept a $550,360 grant used to help renovate the Noonan House and build 18 units of affordable housing on Ockert Lane and to abide by the terms of the agreement. VOTE: unanimous (5-0); motion carried.

9. ERRORS AND OMISSIONS MOTION by Mr. Silcox, seconded by Mr. Dudley, to accept the State of Vermont Property Valuation and Review information that the value of the Vermont Gas infrastructure in Shelburne was not accurate, and revise the value of Vermont Gas System from $729,200 to $1,326,700 on the Shelburne Grand List, and issue a revised tax bill. DISCUSSION: Mr. Bohne pointed out that the revision might reopen the grievance/appeal process. VOTE: unanimous (5-0); motion carried.

10. APPROVAL OF FUNDING FOR A FITNESS ROOM Mr. Bohne explained the proposed addition of a fitness room at the Police Department and expanding privileges to all Town employees and spouses, including the Fire and Rescue departments. The program was $7,000 short to finish the room. Polices would be required regarding safety and use. Staff would explore other funding sources to finish the project. Mr. Faris pointed out that information was still being generated and suggested tabling discussion. In response to Board questions, Mr. Bohne explained the fitness room was a long-term temporary solution. Funding sources included $2,300 from the Rescue budget and (Fire Department) donations. There was discussion regarding room use, sign out of key via the Police Department dispatcher (would have minimal impact on the dispatcher’s work load), proposed policy language for Town department use, and annual fees to be charged. Mr. Bohne noted that a waiver document related to insurance/liability would be reviewed by the Town Attorney. Mr. Silcox requested that the Recreation Director provide proper equipment use instruction. The proposed fitness room would be added to the next Board meeting agenda for continued discussion and action item consideration. Mr. Good made a motion to spend up to $3,000 for flooring for the proposed Police Department fitness room. Mr. Bohne withdrew a request for a motion for funding to allow further discussion at the next meeting of the Board. Mr. Good withdrew his motion.

10a) ROAD NAMING MOTION by Mr. Faris, seconded by Mr. Dudley, to approve the road name “Point View Drive” located at the O’Brien/Precourt development off of Bay Road. VOTE: unanimous (5-0); motion carried. Mr. Bohne explained that there was no formal process for naming roads. The naming of a road, such as Ockert Drive, occurred because it was included on the site map plans of the development. An ordinance or policy might be needed.

11. GENERAL FUND BUDGET STATUS Mr. Frankenburg reviewed the status of the FY03/04 General Fund budget Year-To-Date. A more detailed analysis would be forwarded for the next quarter, which would include a Sewer Fund status. Revenue (page 1) included $98,500 for the CSSU lease paid in July and CSSU maintenance per the agreement. Staff was tracking insurance renewals, stormwater compliance, and Board of Civil Authority (BCA) appeals. It was projected that the BCA appeal decisions would continue to decrease the Grand List. It was anticipated that legal expenses would be over budget, however, the FY03 Fund balance finished ahead of projections and would absorb some of the losses. An audit would be conducted in a month. Mr. Frankenburg would prepare projections for Board review.

12. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 09/23/03 MOTION by Mr. Silcox, seconded by Mr. Good, to approve the minutes of 09/23/03 with the following correction: • Page 7, Agenda #9, 2nd motion, under Discussion - change to read “…error that in this case the error was in writing and that was …” VOTE: unanimous (5-0); motion carried.

13. MANAGER’S REPORT Mr. Bohne reported on the following items: • The Noonan House lead and asbestos removal was expected to take six months. • The Fire Department received an $112,000 (90/10) matching FEMA grant to purchase a “brush” truck. The current truck would be sold and included in the next FY Capital Project list budget. • The Rescue Squad received a $21,000 grant for portable Self Containment Breathing Apparatus equipment. Mr. Silcox requested a catalog of all grants applied for.

14. BOARD MEMBER CONCERNS Mr. Silcox asked that the Selectboard meeting schedule change the date 12/23/03 to 12/09/03 and 12/18/03. Mr. Bohne noted that Stormwater documents had been included in the Board packet. Decisions were required and the Board must understand the legislative process. Mr. Silcox suggested sending a letter to each Hullcrest and Longmeadow Road resident regarding stormwater mitigation plan impacts. Mr. Bohne said that the Town received a draft study of both neighborhoods and the consultants would present findings and recommended solutions. Mr. Dates reported the GBIC Regional Economic Study was complete. A CCTA informational memo was received. A report regarding the success of the CCTA Shelburne routes and the impact on the Town budget was needed.

15. ADJOURNMENT MOTION by Mr. Good, seconded by Mr. Dudley, to adjourn the regular meeting and reconvene Executive Session for the purpose of discussing contracts and litigation where premature knowledge would place the Town at a disadvantage, and invited the Town Manager to attend.

VOTE: unanimous (5-0); motion carried. The regular meeting was adjourned at 9:40 p.m. The Board entered Executive Session. Minutes respectfully submitted by Kathlyn Furr, Recording Secretary. Approved, Stephen Dates Selectboard Chair

TOWN OF SHELBURNE
SELECTBOARD MEETING MINUTES
OCTOBER 28, 2003

MEMBERS PRESENT: Steve Dates, Chairperson; Steve Good, Jim Dudley, George Faris, Norm Silcox.

STAFF PRESENT: Paul Bohne, Town Manger, Peter Frankenburg, Financial Officer.

OTHERS PRESENT: Elaine Dates, Arthur Kunin, Lourette Allis, Donna DeForge, Andy Racine, Beth Wulfson, Andy Simmons, Chris Davis, Ellen London, Alec Webb, Margaret Bouchard, Donald Hay, Joan Forgays, Jessica Ennis, Kevin O’Brien, Gail Henderson-King, Dorothea Penar, Joyce Errecart, Jackie Errecart, Emily Morrow, Hope Alswang, Crea Lintilac, Robert Furrer, Ray L’Esperance, Linda L’Esperance, Sue Davis (Shelburne News), and others.

1. CALL TO ORDER Mr. Dates, Chairperson, called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. and introduced members of the Board.

2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Agenda changes: Add Item 10a - Downtown Designation and Item 11a - Liquor License Request.

3. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION There were no comments

4. UPDATE ON LIBRARY VESTIBULE ADDITION Elaine Dates, Pierson Library Trustee representative, reported that construction of the library vestibule addition would start Monday, 11/03/03. Funding was $3,000 short, but community support of in-kind service and donations have been generous.

5. VELCO UPDATE AND FUTURE ACTION Steve Dates reported the Public Service Board has issued an order to consolidate parties into groups. A special Selectboard meeting was held to discuss possible strategy on a position for, against, or neutral. Discussion of topics included establishing criteria that can be applied to Shelburne on a local level and at the state level with regard to setbacks from a utility structure, Shelburne issues related to economic impacts, and working with the Public Service Board, VELCO, and Selectboard. The Board may schedule a special meeting before the 11/10/03 Public Service Board deadline. Mr. Dates outlined the Public Service Board (PSB) procedure, VELCO project costs, and discussions with Charlotte regarding approaches. Emily Morrow reported on the VELCO Ad Hoc Committee meeting with VELCO representative Tom Dunn. Issues included easements and expenses to acquire easements, hard and soft costs (underground lines versus overhead), a site walk of the proposed Shelburne route, and discussion with Michael Dworkin regarding the status of the PSB Consolidation Order Conference to be held. Suggestions for issues to be raised at the conference include creating a separate subcategory for a town that supports the project, but has issues/concerns, creating a liaison committee between Shelburne, Charlotte, Vergennes (possibly Ferrisburgh) for a collaborative effort, and moving to a more formal stage in the proceedings. Ms. Morrow said she had joined the tour of the entire proposed VELCO upgrade route. There was lengthy discussion regarding aesthetics, safety, and health issues in Shelburne, information that buried lines could result in significantly lowered EMF levels, discovery that VELCO relied on outside experts when lines were buried versus using VELCO engineers, and that the chief counsel for the PSB had said the consolidation approach was a first time approach. Mr. Silcox expressed interest in a neutral position with the intent to work with the PSB and VELCO to reach consensus on issues. Shelburne could take a pro/con position once discussions were held. Mr. Faris suggested drafting universal criteria that could be applied by the PSB and other line upgrades. This would give a better idea of costs. If there was a state policy, then costs could be borne by rate payers. Ms. Morrow said she had been in communication with Jenny Cole, Charlotte Selectboard and VELCO Committee member, and will check with the other four towns regarding their position on the Consolidation Conference. There were seven towns considered for the Consolidation Conference. The next VELCO Ad hoc Committee meeting was scheduled for Thursday, 10/30/03. PUBLIC COMMENTS Hope Alswang, Shelburne Museum Executive Director, said this was the first she had heard about a consolidation conference and expressed concern regarding visual impacts to the Museum with historic preservation designation. In the Museum’s case, it was hard to say yea or nay, but the implications were huge. Ms. Alswang asked about visual studies (balloon testing) and who would pay for the studies. Ms. Alswang stated she did not trust VELCO to perform visual effects tests. Mr. Furrer, Shelburne Museum representative, also expressed concern events were moving along rapidly without sufficient information. Mr. Faris said it was too late for the Museum to seek party status via a filing of intervention. Individual landowners should have received notice of the proceedings. Shelburne did move to intervene and was granted party status. If the Museum was barred, they could participate through the VELCO Ad hoc Committee. Carefully drafted motions could put the burden on VELCO to do the visual impact studies, said Mr. Faris. Ms. Morrow reported that Terry Boyle (VELCO landscape engineer) pointed out that there were historic criteria in Act 248 to address national historic status. Andy Simmons, resident, mentioned the PSB had received a motion to appeal the Consolidation Conference by an interested party in Vergennes. There was further discussion regarding exploring common sense criteria versus scientific data, which could be worded generically so that other towns could use the criteria as well, developing the issues (costs, concerns) for each of the seven towns (Vergennes expressed historic preservation issues versus health and economic impacts to Shelburne neighborhoods), having the Shelburne Town Attorney review proposed criteria before the PSB deadline, and scheduling a special Selectboard meeting on Thursday, 11/06./03, at 7:00 p.m.

6. STORMWATER UNEXPIRED PERMITS Mr. Bohne reviewed the on-going issue of expired stormwater permits in 13 developments related to delayed real estate closings and funds held in escrow accounts. Staff has forwarded a proposal to deal with the situation for Board consideration. Mr. Bohne explained a joint effort between the Town and neighborhoods to address the expired permits and a cost sharing mechanism, which calculated an averaged impervious surface within a neighborhood to determine costs. Renewed permits would be issued in the name of the Town. The Town would be responsible for permits in the future. Recertification could be done by outside engineering firms. There was discussion regarding a potential regional utility, stormwater retention ponds, culvert installations and street sweeping related to annual costs and how to pay (tax payers or a stormwater utility), costs to bring existing systems up to 2003 standards and on-going maintenance, criteria to accept expired permits, and Monroe Brook relative to WHIP appeals. Mr. Silcox expressed concern about unknown costs and before/after measurements of impaired waterways to determine when a stormwater system was “fixed”. Joyce Errecart, Vermont House Representative, noted that the Town’s concerns were received. Ms. Errecart said she had contacted state agencies and was now concerned about methodologies used relative to the Monroe Brook impairment determination. The state did not have data on silting and phosphorus in the brook. Testing was not done this October due to dry conditions. Mr. Dates commented if it takes $35,000 to address the permit problems, then the Town should address the issue versus discussing standards, measurements, and cost allocations. Mr. Silcox asked what happens if a homeowner’s association disbanded. Mr. Bohne replied that the Town would deal with individuals or associations. Once an association upgraded a development system, the Town would take it over. If a development did not have a stormwater system, then they would have to install one. The current 13 developers must submit a letter of intent to conduct a stormwater system evaluation by the 11/15/03 deadline. Mr. Faris said that a warrantee from the developer would make them liable for permit specifications. In response to a Board question, Mr. Bohne explained that costs would be borne by a neighborhood if a system was not in compliance. A system in compliance would be re-certified. The issue was for non-impaired waterways only. SUGGESTED REVISIONS: • Delete the words “…shared responsibility” where there was compliance in #4, 5, 7 and 9. • Add that costs were to be billed back to the development where a stormwater system was not in compliance. • Add that an engineer’s design would be approved by the State of Vermont. Staff will forward a revised draft policy to the Board for action at a later time.

7. REQUEST FOR RELIEF FROM PENALTY FOR DELINQUENT PROPOERTY TAXES – Ray and Linda L’Esperance Mr. Bohne reviewed a brief history of the original delinquency of $129.41 with compounded interest and penalty charges for a current delinquency of $3,818.54. The objective was to settle the issue versus a tax sale. Mr. L’Esperance explained he purchased the property in May 1994, and made an effort to settle an overdue tax bill sent to the previous homeowner. Mr. L’Esperance said he had never been late making tax payments and requested that the Board waive penalties and interest to settle an error in the Town Clerk’s office. Mr. Bohne said that a tax bill was sent to the owner of record on April 1st, which was the policy at the time. The bill went to the previous owner’s new address. Staff had no opinion on the issue and no opinion was requested from the Town Attorney. The situation was unique, conceded Mr. Bohne. Mr. Silcox asked if Mr. L’Esperance would consider 12 monthly payments. Mr. L’Esperance replied he was asking the Town to waive an error, but would pay the interest if the penalty was waived. MOTION by Mr. Good, seconded by Mr. Dudley, to waive property tax penalty of $2,071.31 for Ray and Linda L’Esperance, 3113 Shelburne Road. DISCUSSION: Mr. Silcox suggested adding the payment of $1,747.23 incurred interest. There was brief discussion of whether to vote to waive the penalty. CALL THE QUESTION by Mr. Good. Discussion ceased. VOTE: 3 ayes, 2 nays (Mr. Faris, Mr. Silcox); motion carried.

8. APPROVAL OF BUDGET SCHEDULE MOTION by Mr. Faris, seconded by Mr. Silcox, to approve the budget schedule as presented. DISCUSSION: Mr. Silcox asked to change the 12/23/03 meeting date. Mr. Bohne said a budget review could be added to the meeting on 12/18/03. It was the consensus of the Board to reschedule the 12/23/03 Selectboard meeting to Wednesday, 12/17/3, and to add a budget review to the agenda. VOTE: unanimous (5-0); motion carried.

9. PRELIMINARY PROJECTIONS OF GENERAL FUND TAX RATE Mr. Bohne stressed that the presentation of the General Fund tax rate projection was very preliminary at this time. Peter Frankenburg summarized assumptions. FY04/05 Capital projects were included. Mr. Frankenburg reviewed revenue increases driven by Davis Park improvements. Stormwater re-certification was not included. It was assumed that BCA appeal decisions to the Grand List would net out. Current dispatch contracts were included, but not the new contracts. Mr. Dates noted that a $15,000 grant was anticipated for Pierson Library funding. Mr. Bohne said that mandated issues, such as $200,000 for the salt shed and $80,000 for WHIP stormwater appeals, must also be considered. There was brief discussion of Act 68 impacts in FY04.

10. REVIEW OF RECENT GRANT AWARDS AND BOARD ACCEPTANCE Mr. Frankenburg provided a summary of FEMA and federal grants, criteria, parameters and grant amounts awarded for FY04. Mr. Bohne reported that a method of grant application sign-off by Town administration has been instituted (the Town Manager, Financial Officer, or Selectboard as required). It was requested that the Board review the reports and accept grants via action. It was noted which grants required Board approval. Line items for grant match amounts would appear in each department budget. It was suggested a column be added to the budget showing the amount of relief afforded to the current or future budget by the grants. MOTION by Mr. Silcox, seconded by Mr. Dudley, to approve the Active Grant List for FY03/04 as asterisked in the outline by the Financial Officer, dated 10/23/03, and as presented. VOTE: unanimous (5-0); motion carried.

10a) DOWNTOWN DESIGNATION Mr. Bohne reviewed a draft Downtown Designation application as a Village Center for Board consideration. Staff was seeking a resolution verifying a new village core. It was an amendable application if changes to the district were required in the future. MOTOIN by Mr. Faris, seconded by Mr. Good, to approve the draft resolution for a Downtown Designation application for a Village Center as presented. VOTE: unanimous (4-0) [Mr. Silcox not present for vote.]; motion carried.

11. TOWN FITNESS ROOM FUNDING Mr. Bohne reviewed a proposal to fund completion of a Town fitness room located at the Village Center for Town employees and spouses. The Fire Chief would present the proposal to the Fire Department. MOTION by Mr. Faris, seconded by Mr. Silcox, to approve funds to complete a Town Employee Fitness Room. VOTE: unanimous (5-0); motion carried.

11a) LIQUOR LICENCE REQUEST The Board signed a request for a liquor license by the Old Shed Bar and Grill, formerly known as the Corkscrew Bar and Grill.

12. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OCTOBER 14, 2003 MOTION by Mr. Silcox, seconded by Mr. Dudley, to approve the minutes of 10/14/03 with the following corrections: Page 2, item #5, VELCO Ad hoc Committee, 1st line - change “raised $13,000” to “committed $13,000”; Page 5, item #14, 1st line - change to read “…the 12/23/03 meeting date to 12/18/03”. VOTE: unanimous (5-0); motion carried. OCTOBER 15, 2003 MOTION by Mr. Silcox, seconded by Mr. Good, to approve the minutes of 10/15/03 with the following corrections: Page 1, list of attendees - delete the name “George Faris”; Page 1, Motion - change to read: “seconded by Mr. Dates” and “VOTE; 4-0, (Mr. Faris not in attendance)”. VOTE: 4 ayes, 1 abstention (Mr. Faris); motion carried.

13. MANAGER’S REPORT Mr. Bohne reported on the following items: • CCTA representatives would be invited to the next Selectboard meeting to discuss Shelburne route updates, ridership and expenses. • A Vermont League of Towns and Cities letter was received regarding proposed local option tax issues. At this time Shelburne did not qualify for a local options tax. A survey of Shelburne businesses was suggested (criteria to apply, determine if a local tax would impact residents versus out of town visitors, and impacts to the property tax). Staff would advise the VLTC regarding Board interest in support of any changes. • Tom Clavell would resign his Shelburne Community School Board membership once the Board approved a candidate for the position.

14. BOARD MEMBER CONCERNS There were no Board member concerns.

15. ADJOURNMENT The Chairman adjourned the meeting at 10:25 p.m.
Minutes respectfully submitted by Kathlyn Furr, Recording Secretary. Approved, Stephen B. Dates, Chairman