May 2010
MINUTES SUBJECT TO CORRECTION BY THE SHELBURNE SELECTBOARD. CHANGES, IF ANY, WILL BE RECORDED IN THE MINUTES OF THE NEXT MEETING OF THE BOARD. | TOWN OF SHELBURNE SELECTBOARD MINUTES OF MEETING May 11, 2010 MEMBERS PRESENT: Robert Roesler (Chairman), Tim Pudvar, Al Gobeille, Bill Smith, Gary von Stange. ADMINISTRATION: Paul Bohne, Town Manager; Peter Frankenburg, Finance Director; Dean Pierce, Town Planner. OTHERS PRESENT: Joan Lenes, Gwen Webster, David Webster, Dick Elkins, Kay Kraushaar, Maria Horn, Sean Folley, Dorothea Penar, Ruth Painter, Sam Chauncey, John Saar, Peter Gibbs, Russ Colvin, JoAnn Paquette, Eric Fritzeen, David Conard, Don & Carol Lewis, Brian Precourt, Janice Nicklas, David Dummit, Bill Deming, Tina Kurrelmeyer, Morris Pike, Ann Hogan, William Hogan, Fritz Horton, Laurie (Lawrence) Smith, Joel Baird (Burlington Free Press), Danielle Frawley (Shelburne News), and others. 1. CALL TO ORDER Robert Roesler called the meeting to order at 7 PM. 2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Addition(s): Ø Item 4.a (formerly Item 10) – Consider Approval of a Liquor License for the Shelburne Steakhouse and Saloon (Formerly the Sirloin Saloon) Ø Item 9.a – Resolution for Fire Truck 3. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION Robert Roesler noted the Selectboard will listen to comments on the process of appointments to the Development Review Board, but not on individual candidates which is the purview of the Selectboard and part of the decision making process. There were no comments from the public at this time. 4. PUBLIC HEARING: AMENDMENT TO SHELBURNE TOWN PLAN MAP The public hearing was opened at 7:04 PM. Town Planner, Dean Pierce, briefly reviewed the proposed changes to the zoning map (land at Shelburne Farms changed from the Conservation District to the Rural District). The zoning regulations have already been modified. There were no comments from the public. MOTION by Gary von Stange, SECOND by Tim Pudvar, to close the public hearing on changes to the Shelburne Town Plan Map. VOTING: unanimous (5-0); motion carried. MOTION by Gary von Stange, SECOND by Bill Smith, to adopt the amendments to the Town Plan Future Land Use Map 5 as warned for public hearing. VOTING: unanimous (5-0); motion carried. 4.a CONSIDER APPROVAL OF LIQUOR LICENSE FOR THE SHELBURNE STEAKHOUSE AND SALOON (formerly Sirloin Saloon) The Selectboard signed the liquor license document(s) for the Shelburne Steakhouse and Saloon which is slated to open for business on 7/1/10. 5. CONSIDER AMENDING ORDINANCE TO ESTABLISH A CHARGE ON NEW USERS OF SEWER CAPACITY BY AMENDING ATTACHMENT A (Estimated Allocation for Categories Not Subject to Three Year Capacity Allocation) AND ATTACHMENT B (Three Year Sewage Treatment Capacity Allocation) The public hearing was opened at 7:10 PM. Paul Bohne reported there is ample capacity available. There were no comments from the public. MOTION by Gary von Stange, SECOND by Bill Smith, to close the public hearing on the amendments to Attachment A and B of the sewer ordinance. VOTING: unanimous (5-0); motion carried. MOTION by Bill Smith, SECOND by Tim Pudvar, to adopt the new three year allocation as described in revised Attachments A & B. VOTING: unanimous (5-0); motion carried. 6. INTERVIEW APPLICANTS FOR APPOINTMENT TO DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD The Selectboard interviewed Peter Gibbs, Laurie (Lawrence) Smith, David Conard, and Russ Colvin for vacancies on the Development Review Board (DRB). PETER GIBBS’ RESPONSES TO INTERVIEW QUESTIONS: Background Information: Town resident for 17 years with wife and two children, civil engineer, done work along the east coast, but mainly in Vermont, New Hampshire, New York, and Maine, enjoy volunteering for the town. Definition of quasi-judicial position: DRB is an administrative board that administers the zoning code, conditional use criteria, and subdivision regulations. DRB members look at applications to see if they meet the criteria and rules of the town, and if so they pass, and if not, then conditions are applied to the application that if met will then meet the criteria and rules of the town. Expectation of the process and standards of service with an application before the board: It is expected the application will be read and the code applied, and explanation given where and why the code is not met and how to change the application to better meet the code. Quick response to questions and stating concerns early so the applicant can respond is also expected. The board should try to get the questions out first and resolve areas of misunderstanding and move on. Issues may come up later as new evidence or as new information is given, but the board and applicant should try in a methodical way to figure it out. Most compelling reason to be selected to serve on the DRB: Doing a good job. It takes a while to understand the code and all tenets of the town plan. Have served for five years (two years jointly on the DRB and Planning Commission). Worked on the update of the town plan and zoning to set why the town is the way it is and how to change for the future. Have seen where an application is non-complicated and can move in a quick manner with a quick decision versus more complicated applications with questions. Have been very conducive to the development community to get hearings done in a timely manner, deal with special requests, and move forward. If asked to deviate from procedures, have considered the request and if can then done so and moved the project along. Been able to look at the code, be an advocate for the code and not any project in particular. Am an advocate of the rules and regulations and the town plan of Shelburne, and make decisions based on those written documents. Deviation from the DRB charge of enforcing the zoning bylaws, subdivision regulations, and town plan: DRB administers, not enforces, the regulations. The Planning Commission makes the rules. The DRB can suggest changes, but makes decisions based on the rules. The DRB has no budget and cannot encumber the town by saying a project is wanted. The DRB is misunderstood sometimes. Members have to be a student of the code and dig deeper into the code to find answers. Synopsized vision of Shelburne for the future and thoughts on growth: Shelburne has a good town plan and ordinance. Do like the vision in the town plan with the village center having the densest development radiating out to less dense development. Want to keep the character and “grand avenue” of Shelburne; that is why we live here. My vision of the town is what is in the town plan document. Regarding development and development growth, it will happen. People want to be here. Development and growth has to be managed. The town plan and zoning ordinance is the management tool. A good ordinance directs where growth happens (where, the mix). When the code does not match what is happening then you have to go back and change it. Dealing with conflict of interest: Recuse myself and leave the room so no influence is given on either side. Regarding a board member making comments as a citizen, it is recognized the Selectboard is uncomfortable with this. There is not much communication between boards and there should be a way this can happen. There is a need to communicate better, maybe through staff or special meetings. Closing comments: Enjoy begin on the board. Wanted to volunteer for 10 years for the town so another term would be good. It has been fun and a growing exercise. Gary von Stange announced he served with Peter Gibbs on the Planning Commission for a year and found without failing Mr. Gibbs to be a man of great integrity. LAURIE (LAWRENCE) SMITH’S RESPONSES TO INTERVIEW QUESTIONS: Background Information: Town resident since 1995, lived in Burlington area since 1978, owner of Perkins Smith Design Build in So. Burlington, done a number of development projects in Shelburne and surrounding towns, created the Monroe Brook Woods subdivision, have been through the development review process including Act 250, feel my experience would be beneficial to the DRB, would like to be able to give back to the town. Expectation of the process and standards of service with an application before the board: Overall the standard would be for the DRB to apply the regulations of the town to permit the application and to judge the application on the criteria. During sketch plan review it is hoped there would be some brainstorming and feedback about what might make the project better and what the town is hoping to see happen as well as feedback on where the project is missing. As the application moves through the process it is expected to move from brainstorming to specifics…the project meets this requirement, but not this requirement, this is what needs to change, and this is what is good…and continue with that format. Some boards have been friendly and others make the process like pulling teeth. It is a drag to fight for a project that is going to benefit a community. My position in the beginning is to help the project be the best it can be and then applying the letter of the law. Faced with decision with no clear right/wrong answer: There is grey and all have their interpretation of the ordinance and what it says. Essentially you need to look at the letter of the law and try to understand. If there is a grey area and questions the board cannot answer then the planning commission or other boards should be asked for an answer. The DRB’s job as a quasi-judicial board is to get rid of the grey. With proper debate the answers will come forward. Definition of quasi-judicial board: The board’s job is to interpret laws and apply them to projects to the best of their ability with integrity, clarity, and consistency. Appearance before DRB in last year and public comment on the Shelburne Wood project: No appearance or public comment. Followed the project tangentially. Dealing with conflict of interest: Recuse and stay out of it. Read town plan and how align with it: The town plan is a solid plan. As a DRB member you need to set aside opinion as best possible and interpret the plan as written. Having a passion for development that puts Shelburne in a position for a new energy economy in a new world we are rapidly moving toward, it is hoped Shelburne will be ready to be a strong player. Vision for Shelburne in the future: Shelburne is on the vanguard of a successful town plan, sustainable energy and consumption. One business goal is to help decrease the carbon footprint in Vermont one building at a time. As well, bringing a passion to the board and a desire to see the board looking at projects and encouraging people to think about where they want to be in 20 years, not just how to get the next project through. There is no intention to put my business plan into the bylaws, but rather in terms of interpretation and in terms of the application. You need to read a sentence, understand it and apply it. My integrity and passion for interpreting the regulations will be present on the board, and in the beginning there is hope to do some of the influencing. Most compelling reason to be selected to serve on the DRB: My passion and vision which will be useful in the beginning stage of the review process. Other board members would be relied on to help with the details. Am very good at reaching consensus and looking at the facts and seeing the “forest for the trees”. Hope to bring some fun to it, too. Closing comments: Love living in Shelburne for the past 15 years. Is a great town with huge potential. The downtown core of Shelburne feels like an uncut gem. Not saying want to change the town dramatically, but there is huge potential for the town in location and population and perspective, and it is great to be able to contribute to that process. DAVID CONARD’S RESPONSES TO INTERVIEW QUESTIONS: Background Information: Town resident for over a decade with wife and three step-children, real estate and construction attorney for the past 25 years, grew up in a small Vermont town, enjoy outdoor activities (biking, skiing, the lake), serve on COTS board for over a decade and work with the Vermont Youth Conservation Corps, would like the opportunity to put interest in public service and real estate law to use on the DRB. Dealing with conflict of interest: Disclose and recuse (leave the room). Most compelling reason to be selected to serve on the DRB: My experience as a real estate lawyer would be beneficial as well as my experience with substantive law and procedural matters. On occasion have served as judge in Chittenden County Small Claims Court so been involved in that manner. Also, have long term interest in the issue of land use. Disagreement with advice from Town Attorney: If the situation did arise would like the Town Attorney to discuss with the board how the conclusion was reached. Am not looking for a position on the board to represent the DRB (as counsel). My experience would allow framing information and presenting the facts in a way that a cogent opinion comes back. Read town plan and vision, specifically growth: Have read the town plan and do feel is a thorough and well thought out document that sets the appropriate priorities for the town. On the DRB my job is to apply the town plan. There are areas for more emphasis other than housing and open space. Now the town plan is a vision statement that articulates a good vision for a bedroom community. Appropriate agriculture, small business, and other transportation needs to be encouraged. My vision in terms of dealing with an application does not have a place. Often there will be a clear yes or no answer in the zoning ordinance or subdivision regulations. If not, then go to the town plan to interpret ambiguities, and then fall back on legal principle that land use ordinances are restrictions on private property rights, and if there is not an answer in the ordinance or town plan then the default position is allowing people to exercise their property rights. Appearance before DRB in last year and public comment on the Shelburne Wood project: Have appeared twice at hearings involving the Shelburne Wood project, but not having to do with the merits of the case or being for or against the application. In both instances the DRB chairman was encouraged to conduct discussions in open session, not deliberative session. Expectation of the process and standards of service with an application before the board: Promptness, open give-and-take particularly early in the process, getting as many issues on the table as early as possible for free exchange of ideas. At sketch it is fine to say the project would be better if this is changed, but when get to preliminary or final it is appropriate to vote whether the project meets the ordinance or not. It is important that the DRB respect the boundary between the project and the regulatory process. Let the applicant know early if it appears the project does not meet the ordinance unless this is changed, and give the opportunity to make the change. If the change is not made then the project is voted up or down. Do not favor putting in conditions at the last moment without giving a clear message to the applicant about what has to change. There is a place for conditions, but the conditions should not alter the substance of the project. If the applicant applies for a 15 lot subdivision and the DRB says the project needs to scale back in order to get approval then the applicant decides to make the change, and if no change is made, the DRB votes on the project as presented. Rather than have conditions on a project the better procedure is to make it clear to the applicant that the project as designed is not going to cut it, and give the opportunity to redesign rather than give conditions. Closing comments: Could bring valuable experience to the board that would be valuable in the process as well as substantive outcomes. Have appeared before a variety of review boards (DRB, planning commissions, environmental commissions, district environmental board) and served as judge. RUSS COLVIN’S RESPONSES TO INTERVIEW QUESTIONS: Background Information: Town resident for 28 years, own a construction company, worked on numerous projects in the Shelburne area, done projects for Green Mountain Development Group (Lakewood, Farmstead, Deer Run, and others), been a construction manager and superintendent manager in the Shelburne area for most of adult life, was construction manager for projects at Shelburne Bay Senior Living, Shelburne Farms (the inn, coach barn, farm barn, dairy), and Perry’s Fish House, am a civil engineer, architectural administrator, and Clerk of the Works for various municipalities in the state, do some work for the state as Parks & Conservation Coordinator through the Agency of Natural Resources working with at-risk youth to develop construction skills. Agree with major goals and objectives of the Town Plan: Have read portions of the town plan and support the village center philosophy, the agricultural goals, and conservation goals in the purchase of land and the way public lands are administered. How reconcile differences in personal view and town plan: Have been before many boards in my professional work and feel can eliminate personal bias with a great degree of integrity. Definition of quasi-judicial board: The DRB is an administrative board modeled after the legal system. The premise is the purpose of looking after the public interest in administering applications for development and or conservation. Most compelling reason to be selected to serve on the DRB: Have lots of experience in being able to sift through construction documents quickly. Do lots of estimating as part of my consulting services for commercial development projects. Dealing with conflict of interest: Recuse as would have had to be done with the Shelburne Wood project because of professional interest in the project. Expectation of the process and standards of service with an application before the board: First expectation is better deliberation between the DRB and town staff and the Planning Commission and the Selectboard. Shelburne needs to find a way to get lines of communication enhanced somehow. It is frustrating to see projects before the DRB and having a large majority of the members not understand what they are looking at and appear to almost be coerced into decision making in a very short period of time without having a good understanding of what is in front of them. A lot of that is because there has been a bit of a failure between town staff and the DRB because of time constraints. The DRB is a voluntary board and there are not a huge number of hours available. There should be more time in terms of having training and having good communication on projects where decisions need to be made quickly. If the public expects the DRB to look at a set of documents and understand them in the public purview then that is unrealistic. It takes time to understand the documents and make a reasonable decision. Do want the opportunity to help to change the process so there is better communication between town staff and the DRB, and perhaps the planning commission so when the DRB comes in front of the public they have a good understanding of what is in front of them in terms of paperwork before being asked to respond. This happens in small, rural communities, but in larger communities with more development happening the more isolated the boards tend to be from one another. Training for new members is an important part of getting the initial understanding of the resources and what is not allowed. Closing comments: None. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON THE APPOINTMENT PROCESS Don Lewis, Maple Leaf Lane, spoke in support of the process and the question/answer format. Mr. Lewis urged thinking about executive session and making sure people will react to conditions as they come so all understand them. John Saar, Shelburne resident, asked about enlarging the board with additional members. Mr. Roesler said the Selectboard has not made a decision relative to having alternates to serve in cases of conflict of interest recusal or illness. Mr. Saar urged maintaining the current number of members and reviewing the DRB process with the Shelburne Wood project which was a great loss to the town. The process was unduly lengthy and appeared at times to be almost capricious. It is hoped the Selectboard holds the DRB collectively responsible for the substantial loss to the town and acts appropriately. There were no further comments. 7. EXECUTIVE SESSION: PERSONNEL MOTION by Bill Smith, SECOND by Tim Pudvar, to go into Executive Session to discuss personnel matters and to invite the Town Manager to attend. VOTING: unanimous (5-0); motion carried. Executive Session was convened at 8:13 PM. Executive Session was adjourned and the regular meeting reconvened at 9:30 PM. Chairman Roesler announced the Selectboard has strong feelings alternates will make the DRB’s job easier. Some individuals may be contacted in the near future regarding serving as DRB alternates. 8. CONSIDER APPOINTMENTS TO THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MOTION by Gary von Stange, SECOND by Tim Pudvar, to appoint Dick Elkins to a three year term on the DRB. VOTING: 2 ayes, 3 nays (Roesler, Smith, Gobeille); motion did not carry. Dick Elkins is not appointed to the DRB. MOTION by Tim Pudvar, SECOND by Gary von Stange, to appoint Kay Kraushaar to a three year term on the DRB. VOTING: unanimous (5-0); motion carried. Kay Kraushaar is appointed to the DRB. MOTION by Gary von Stange, SECOND by Tim Pudvar, to appoint Peter Gibbs to a three year term on the DRB. VOTING: unanimous (5-0); motion carried. Peter Gibbs is appointed to the DRB. MOTION by Tim Pudvar, SECOND by Gary von Stange, to appoint David Conard to a three year term on the DRB. VOTING: unanimous (5-0); motion carried. David Conard is appointed to the DRB. Thanks were extended to Don Horenstein, Laurie (Lawrence) Smith, and Russ Colvin for their interest in serving on the DRB. Dick Elkins was recognized and thanked for his service on the DRB and continued service as Chairman of the Shelburne Planning Commission. 9. PRESENTATION REGARDING TOWN INVOLVEMENT IN LEASING ANTENNA SPACE ON PRITCHARD MOUNTAIN ON BEHALF OF TEN AGENCIES DISPATCHED BY SHELBURNE AND CONSIDER AUTHORIZING THE TOWN MANAGER TO EXECUTE A LEASE WITH AMERICAN TOWER CORPORATION Paul Bohne reported there are two towers on Pritchard Mountain in the Town of St. George. A number of emergency organizations use the Hinesburg tower which will be removed. Shelburne has taken the lead in negotiating a lease for space on the American Tower Corp. tower on the site. The terms are $1,000 per month for all the equipment there now and some additional equipment in the future. More organizations can be dispatched with less equipment due to technology changes. All the involved organizations agree this is the direction to take and recommend exercising a lease on the tower. MOTION by Gary von Stange, SECOND by Tim Pudvar, to authorize the Town Manager to execute a lease with American Tower Corporation for antenna space on the tower on Pritchard Mountain. VOTING: unanimous (5-0); motion carried. 9.a RESOLUTION FOR FIRE TRUCK Paul Bohne reported the Town Attorney and Bond Counsel advises the Selectboard that the Board should let the community know in the form of a Resolution if a project cannot be funded in the budget without long-term financing. The Finance Director is working on the bond application for the fire truck bond issue passed in March 2010 and discovered that such a Resolution was not approved by the Board. Bond counsel advised there should be a Resolution in place for this project. Mr. Bohne reviewed the Resolution pertaining to the purchase of a fire truck not to exceed $450,000, public posting of the information, holding a public hearing and a public vote by Australian ballot. MOTION by Bill Smith, SECOND by Tim Pudvar, to approve the resolution regarding bonding for a new fire truck as presented. VOTING: unanimous (5-0); motion carried. 10. CONSIDER APPROVAL OF LIQUOR LICENSE FOR SHELBURNE STEAKHOUSE AND SALOON See Item 4.a above. 11. CONSIDER APPROVAL OF MINUTES (4/27/10) MOTION by Bill Smith, SECOND by Gary von Stange, to approve the 4/27/10 minutes as written. VOTING: unanimous (5-0); motion carried. 12. MANAGER’S REPORT Paul Bohne briefed the Selectboard on the following: - Work is progressing rapidly on the Mt. Philo Road sidewalk.
- Ditch and drainage work is being done on a section of Spear Street to make the area safer for pedestrians and bicyclists.
- The town lease with Verizon will be signed once negotiations are settled between Verizon and Snelling.
- Work at the beach is essentially complete. Only a few minor items remain to be finished.
13. MEMBER CONCERNS Gary von Stange mentioned the recent banquet honoring members of the Shelburne Fire Dept. and Rescue Squad. Jim Talley with 15 years of service was recognized as Officer of the Year. Bill Smith reported there is debris at the corner of Bay Road/Route 7 that needs to be removed. Mr. Bohne said the property owner (Handy) has promised to clean up the area soon. Bill Smith mentioned dead branches on Barstow Road that are in the right-of-way and should be removed. Paul Bohne will follow up on the matter. Al Gobeille mentioned the call from John Saar about park clean up. Paul Bohne confirmed Mr. Saar has been doing some tree cutting and cleaning up the trails. There has been discussion with the Shelburne Natural Resources Committee about removing invasive species and planting native vegetation and trees. 14. ADJOURNMENT MOTION by Bill Smith, SECOND by Al Gobeille, to adjourn the meeting. VOTING: unanimous (5-0); motion carried. The meeting was adjourned at 10:18 p.m. RScty:MERiordan Accepted, For the Shelburne Selectboard
MINUTES SUBJECT TO CORRECTION BY THE SHELBURNE SELECTBOARD. CHANGES, IF ANY, WILL BE RECORDED IN THE MINUTES OF THE NEXT MEETING OF THE BOARD. | TOWN OF SHELBURNE SELECTBOARD MINUTES OF MEETING May 25, 2010 MEMBERS PRESENT: Robert Roesler (Chairman), Tim Pudvar, Al Gobeille, Bill Smith, Gary von Stange. ADMINISTRATION: Paul Bohne, Town Manager; Peter Frankenburg, Finance Director; Bernie Gagnon, Public Works Director; Chris Robinson, Wastewater Plant Chief Operator; Colleen Haag, Town Clerk. OTHERS PRESENT: Janice Nicholas, Robert Lake, Peter Gadue, Danielle Frawley (Shelburne News).
1. CALL TO ORDER Robert Roesler called the meeting to order at 7 PM. Chairman Roesler recognized the events of the past weekend in town, some tragic, noting the Selectboard feels deeply for those involved. The Selectboard and the Town owe a debt of gratitude to Shelburne Rescue and the Fire Dept. as well as all the volunteers for the great service throughout the weekend and for multiple events. 2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Postpone Item #11 (Consider adjusting the sewer charge for the Trinity Episcopal Church) and add Executive Session following regular meeting to discuss personnel matters. 3. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION Janice Nicholas, 673 Mt. Philo Road (26 year resident), said she is upset and angry at the Shelburne Wood decision. The Selectboard had a chance to do something positive for Shelburne Wood, but did not and now 28 families will be turned out of their homes. There is a “fishy odor”, continued Ms. Nicholas, starting with the original owner illegally trying to sell the property out from under the tenants. Now five years later nothing is accomplished except $1.3 million is down the drain. There is question of whether this was a NIMBY situation or “McMansions” were wanted for the money instead of lower income housing. People will watch to see that no one on the town boards make money or profit from what goes before them, assured Ms. Nicholas, adding she has lost confidence in the DRB and Selectboard. The action taken by the Selectboard condones the behavior of the DRB, said Ms. Nicholas. The DRB’s actions are secretive and capricious. There are other examples where an applicant did what the DRB wanted at their expense and then the DRB wanted something else. Also, at a recent DRB meeting an individual in attendance said the DRB was condescending, demeaning and rude to the applicant. Perhaps at the interviews the Selectboard should have asked the candidates if they were on the DRB how they would treat people. Also, the interviews should be open and impartial without any board member endorsing any individual. In closing, Ms. Nicholas suggested that at Thanksgiving when the Selectboard members are in their homes, some that are very expensive houses, thanks should be given that they are not one of the 28 families being thrown out of their home, and it is hoped there will not be thanks given that the families were thrown out of their homes. 4. CONSIDER ACKNOWLEDGING RECEIPT OF PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE TOWN OF SHELBURNE ZONING BYLAWS AND ACCOMPANYING REPORT FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND CONSIDER WARNING A PUBLIC HEARING FOR JUNE 22, 2010 MOTION by Bill Smith, SECOND by Tim Pudvar, to acknowledge receipt of the proposed amendments to the Shelburne zoning bylaws and accompanying report from the Planning Commission, and to warn a public hearing on June 22, 2010. VOTING: unanimous (5-0); motion carried. 5. CONSIDER RECOMMENDING A CANDIDATE TO THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH FOR APPOINTMENT AS TOWN HEALTH OFFICER FOR A THREE YEAR TERM Robert Lake, Clearwater, explained his interest in serving as Town Health Officer. Mr. Lake said he feels he can help mitigate situations and get dialogue going between parties. Chairman Roesler disclosed Mr. Lake is his neighbor. Paul Bohne explained the Town Health Officer typically handles tenant issues. The state health division handles motels. The police will handle situations as necessary. There are typically six to eight calls to the Health Officer annually. The Health Officer needs to be aware of state statute. There is training and a manual for guidance. The Health Officer has authority to take action, but the Selectboard is involved as the local Board of Health. The state depends on the town to make a recommendation for the town health officer. Bob Lake affirmed his understanding of the responsibilities and limitations of the position, stressing his interest in avoiding getting the town involved in litigation, but rather promoting mitigation. MOTION by Bill Smith, SECOND by Tim Pudvar, to appoint Robert Lake as Town Health Officer for a three year term as the recommendation from the Selectboard to the State Department of Health. DISCUSSION: Gary von Stange suggested appointment dates should all be April 1st. Paul Bohne pointed there are a number of appointments that do not begin on April 1st including the MPO, RPC and Town Service Officer. He also stated that the current Health Officer is the Chair of the Selectboard. The Deputy Health Officer is the Town Manager VOTING: unanimous (5-0); motion carried. 6. CONSIDER RECOMMENDING A CANDIDATE TO THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH FOR APPOINTMENT AS DEPUTY HEALTH OFFICER FOR A THREE YEAR TERM MOTION by Tim Pudvar, SECOND by Bill Smith, to (re)appoint Paul Bohne as the Deputy Health Officer for a three year term as the recommendation from the Selectboard to the State Department of Health. VOTING: unanimous (5-0); motion carried. 7. AS SEWER COMMISSION CONSIDER APPROVAL OF WASTEWATER DEPARTMENT BUDGET FOR FY2010-11 Peter Frankenburg reported the Wastewater Dept. operates as a separate enterprise fund. The proposed FY2010-11 was reviewed. Transfers between the Wastewater Budget and the General Fund are noted. The town supports two treatment plants with capacities of 440,000 gpd flowing through Plant #1 and 660,000 gpd flowing through Plant #2. The collection system includes 20 pump stations, 34 miles of sewer main, and 900 manholes. There are 2,095 accounts (up 25 from last year) of mostly residential customers. The department has five full time employees. Annual volumes metered and billed for the most recent 12 months were 131.7 million gallons. Annual volumes treated at the plants for the 12 months ending April 2010 were 237.2 million gallons. Ongoing maintenance is required to keep the system functioning. The current sewer rate is $9.61 per 1,000 gallons. With usage of 70,000 gallons per year (typical single family house) the sewer bill is $673. There is a 3,000 gallon minimum usage. Total expenses proposed in the Wastewater FY10-11 Budget are $1.6 million which is down 3.2% from the current budget. Revenues (other than user fees) are down $103,000 due to a reduced transfer from the capacity fund to the sewer operating budget. Total volumes billed show a downward trend (135 million gallons budgeted versus 132 million gallons actual in the current budget). Volume in the proposed budget is 132 million gallons (2% drop from the FY 2009-10 budget). The rate increase is proposed at 59 cents (6.1% increase). For 70,000 gallons of usage the increase in dollar amount is $41 per year for a total bill of $714 versus $673. The downward trend in usage is due to wet weather (less water used), the economy, smaller families (less population in schools), and conservation (low flow fixtures and appliances). Debt service is 39% of total expenditures. Operations and maintenance are 15% of the budget. Salaries/benefits are 22% of the budget. Utilities, sludge disposal, and other expenses make up the remainder. Mr. Frankenburg reviewed the itemized list of expenditures, noting the most significant increase is the debt service. Debt service for the Longmeadow and Bay Road projects is included in the budget-- the first payments for these projects. The debt includes principle and interest. Sludge disposal cost increased 6.4% because Chittenden Solid Waste District increased their charge to the town. Administrative expenses include billing, collection, and payroll done by town staff and charged back to the Wastewater Dept. The .4% change in salaries and benefits is due to overtime being down and efficient operations. Employees are using compensatory time instead of being paid time and one-half for overtime. A portion of the town’s total insurance premium is allocated to the Wastewater Budget. Mr. Frankenburg highlighted other anticipated decreases in budget items including plant system and SCADA maintenance, utilities, chemicals, testing, and legal expenses. The FY09-10 budget was $1,718,274. The proposed FY10-11 budget is $1,663,113 for a delta of $55,161. There was discussion of the decrease in the plant maintenance budget figure. Peter Frankenburg noted the figure includes plant maintenance and capital improvements. The chemical containment room (capital improvement) is already built. Construction of a concrete pad in the FY 2009-10 budget is expected to be completed by year end. Plant maintenance is for a 24 hour, seven day a week operation. The only capital project planned for FY 2010-11 is to replace the emergency generator at Plant #1, which is estimated to cost $60,000. The current generator is more than 35 years old, and is not reliable. Staff is proposing to use $12,000 from the Capital Improvement Fund which presently contains $53,000 to finance the first year of the expenditure and finance the remainder over the remaining four years of the five year loan. Mr. Frankenburg reviewed revenues in the Wastewater Budget. User fees are up 3.7%, but volumes are down so the rate must be increased. Volume is two percent lower than in the current budget. (135 million gallons budgeted in FY 2009-10 versus 132 million gallons in the 2010-11 proposed budget). Revenues also include interest and penalties (increase of $2,000), and special assessments (Shelburne Heights and Bay Road). There was discussion of accepting septage at the plants. Shelburne’s rates are the second lowest in Chittenden County. Septage from marinas and RVs is not accepted due to the chemicals used. Paul Bohne recalled the grant for the upgrade to the plant required that the town accept septage. The pricing is competitive, but still high compared to the cost of operation. There has been pressure to lower the rate, but this would not cover the associated costs and the septage receipt would then operate at a loss. Transportation distance is the most significant factor. Haulers will go to the closest plant to discharge their loads. Shelburne’s plants took material from another treatment plant this past year when it was under repair. Growth in town will help use excess capacity at the plants. There was continued discussion of usage. The national trend is decreased water and sewer flows. Al Gobeille expressed concern the rate increase may need to be greater than 6.1% to properly maintain the treatment plants. Paul Bohne noted there may be additional pressure next year to increase the budget. Tim Pudvar mentioned expanding the sewer service area. Gary von Stange recalled the Planning Commission discussed increasing the sewer district, but decided against doing this. Mr. von Stange supported having the Planning Commission reconsider the matter and to encourage more businesses to locate in Shelburne. Paul Bohne suggested the topic be discussed at the upcoming joint meeting with the Planning Commission. Peter Frankenburg said the rate is a balance between what is needed, but not necessarily overly conservative. Al Gobeille pointed out users pay the fee. If less volume is used then less revenue is generated, but the debt does not go away. The proper amount of revenue must be raised to pay debt and operate the plants properly. Chris Robinson noted the manhole rehab project has resulted in a reduction of groundwater infiltration/inflow coming into the system. Tim Pudvar asked about the town handling its own sludge disposal rather than working through Chittenden Solid Waste District. Chris Robinson noted having a voice as a group through CSWD is good. Also, CSWD is researching long term alternatives and technology for sludge disposal. CSWD is advocating municipal plants switch to anaerobic digestion to get Class A biosolids which are easier to dispose. Shelburne uses an aerobic digestion process. It may be necessary in the future to transfer sludge to an anaerobic facility for disposal. Peter Frankenburg reviewed the status of debts for waste water projects as of June 2010 (total $7,978,000). As a comparison, in June 2009 the General Fund debt was $5 million. New users are charged a one-time capacity fee when connecting to the system. This compensates for the treatment capacity they will be utilizing. The rate is $16.31 per gallon. The sewer capacity allocation fee for a single family residence is based on 210 gpd and is $3,425. The money is used to pay debt service for capacity expansion to avoid sharp rate increases. The fund balance in the Sewer Capacity Fund (Aid in Expansion) fund at June 30, 2009 was $646,000 of which $300,000 will be withdrawn this year and $220,000 withdrawn in 2011. The amount withdrawn is intended to avoid sharp rate increases in a single year, while not totally depleting the fund. A decision will then be needed as to how fast the fund should be replenished. The number of new homes added to the system this year is projected at five next year. Al Gobeille calculated if the usage continues to decline the number of new homes is not enough to offset rate increases. Peter Frankenburg reviewed projected rates over time (6 years), which show rate increases being necessary each year. MOTION by Bill Smith, SECOND by Gary von Stange, on behalf of the Sewer Commission to recommend approval of the Wastewater Budget for FY2010-11 as presented. DISCUSSION: Al Gobeille suggested the worst case scenario be run to determine the impact on the rate. VOTING: unanimous (5-0); motion carried. 8. PRESENTATION OF FY2010-11 WATER BUDGET AS APPROVED BY THE SHELBURNE WATER COMMISSION Peter Frankenburg reviewed the Water Budget (also an enterprise fund) which was approved by the Shelburne Water Commission. There are 2,258 users (up by 18 from last year) of which 2,067 are residential, 191 are commercial/industrial, and 69 are irrigation users. Volume is 152.8 million gallons. Champlain Water District is the supplier. The Water Dept. has three full time employees. The current water rate is $4.94 per 1,000 gallons. With 70,000 gallons annual use the cost is $346. The proposed FY2010-11 budget is $849,600 (down 3.8% from FY 2009-10) despite the CWD rate increase of 3%. Ten thousand dollars of the surplus fund balance, was applied in FY09-10, but none of the fund balance will be applied in FY10-11. Ten housing units are projected to be connected in FY 2010-11 generating $9,000 in connection fees. Interest income decreased from $13,000 (in FY 2009-10) to $8,000 (in FY 2010-11). Rent from wireless carriers on the water tank is $23,230. Annual sales are 153 million gallons which is a 3.8 % decrease from the FY 2009-10 budget. The proposed rate for FY10-11 is unchanged at $4.94 per 1,000 gallons. The valve replacement project is deferred (expenditures are level funded). Transfers to the Capital Project Fund are reduced. Capital projects include replacement of the utility truck, upgrade of the water tank on Spear Street, and reinforcement of the line in the Upper Meadows development. Water Commissioner, Peter Gadue, added the Upper Meadows project needs to be addressed immediately. Bernie Gagnon, Public Works Director, said there have been maintenance issues and water pressure issues at Upper Meadows. The water flow and ultimate objective of eliminating the pump station was explained. Gary von Stange noted the residents on Ridgefield Road have water pressure issues and would appreciate the town’s assistance in resolving the matter. There was discussion of using the Wake Robin water tank. Paul Bohne noted this will not help without a pump station or individual residences having pumps. Gary von Stange asked if the water line from the cemetery to the Shelburnewood area is included in the list of capital projects. Peter Frankenburg confirmed the Falls Road reinforcement project is in the capital plan, but not scheduled this year. Paul Bohne said the project was estimated and put out to bid, but the bids exceeded the estimates so the project was delayed. Peter Gadue said the Water Commission tried to maintain level funding and hopes more development occurs in town. 9. CONSIDER APPOINTMENT OF ALTERNATES TO SHELBURNE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD FOR A TERM OF ONE YEAR MOTION by Tim Pudvar, SECOND by Al Gobeille, to appoint Laurie (Lawrence) Smith as alternate to the Shelburne DRB for a term of one year. VOTING: unanimous (5-0); motion carried. MOTION by Tim Pudvar, SECOND by Gary von Stange, to appoint Dick Elkins to a one year term as alternate to the Shelburne DRB. VOTING: unanimous (5-0); motion carried. Chairman Roesler thanked all the applicants for applying to the DRB and the alternates for considering serving in that capacity. Gary von Stange suggested the term match the regular member terms. Paul Bohne said the Selectboard can specify the term or say the term is for one year ending when the regular member term ends. 10. CONSIDER REQUEST FROM WILLIAM RATHBONE, TRUSTEE FOR THE ESTAE OF DONALD RATHBONE, FOR WAIVER OF PENALTY IN THE AMOUNT OF $259.81 FOR LATE PAYMENT OF PROPERTY TAXES Paul Bohne reported William Rathbone was not aware of what was due or when on his late father’s estate. MOTION by Gary von Stange, SECOND by Bill Smith, to waive the penalty in the amount of $259.81 for late payment of property taxes on property at 42 Redstone Drive by William Rathbone for the Rathbone Trust. DISCUSSION: Bill Smith recalled in circumstances outside an individual’s control historically the Selectboard has granted the waiver of penalty. VOTING: unanimous (5-0); motion carried. 11. CONSIDER ADJUSTING SEWER CHARGE FOR TRINITY EPISCOPAL CHURCH REQUESTED BY THE CHURCH DUE TO UNEXPLAINED HIGH USAGE Postponed per request of Trinity Episcopal Church. 12. CONSIDER APPROVING RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF DEPOSITING $4 OF EACH $10 FOR THE DOCUMENT RECORDING FEE INTO THE MUNICIPAL RECORDS RESERVE FUND Paul Bohne explained in the effort to digitalize and preserve town records, staff is recommending those who utilize the records pay for the digitalization by depositing a portion of the fee into the reserve fund. Benefits will include more user friendly records, easier searches, and digitalized maps. The cost of the project is estimated at $131,000. There will be $60,000 withdrawn from the fund for the work ($17,000 was deposited into the fund this year). Colleen Haag said in the past the taxpayers paid for the record books and equipment (computers and such). Now the fee paid is based on the documents recorded. Equipment is included in the fee so the users pay for the system. The state wants only electronic records eventually. Gary von Stange asked if searches can be done remotely. Ms. Haag said eventually this will be possible. The system needs to be in place to allow municipalities to collect the fees for research of land records. Also, critical mass is needed to make the system cost effective. MOTION by Bill Smith, SECOND by Gary von Stange, to approve the resolution in support of depositing $4 of each $10 for the document recording fee into the municipal records reserve fund. VOTING: unanimous (5-0); motion carried. 13. CONSIDER APPROVING MINUTES OF MAY 11, 2010 MOTION by Tim Pudvar, SECOND by Bill Smith, to approve the 5/11/10 minutes as written. VOTING: unanimous (5-0); motion carried. 14. MANAGER’S REPORT Paul Bohne reported on the following: Ø Forms for the appointments of Town Health Officer and Deputy Health Officer must be signed by the Selectboard. Ø The beach project is complete and well done. Ø The Mt. Philo sidewalk is complete. Kudos to Bernie Gagnon for a smoothly run project. Ø Pipe slip lining and sealing of manholes is nearly complete. 15. MEMBER CONCERNS Tim Pudvar asked about the Webster Road path. Paul Bohne said easements are being finalized. Some are in hand. Signatures are needed for others. The goal is to begin construction on the path in the fall. Robert Roesler said he heard positive comments on the Mt. Philo sidewalk. Gary von Stange expressed concern abut the timing process and substance of the legal opinion offered on 4/27/10 at 7 PM. 16. EXECUTIVE SESSION and/or ADJOURNMENT MOTION by Bill Smith, SECOND by Tim Pudvar, to adjourn the regular meeting and convene Executive Session to discuss personnel matters, and to invite the Town Manager to attend. VOTING: unanimous (5-0); motion carried. The regular meeting was adjourned and Executive Session convened at 8:46 p.m. The Selectboard exited Executive Session at 9:17 p.m. RScty:MERiordan Accepted, For the Shelburne Selectboard
January 2010
February 2010
March 2010
April 2010
May 2010
June 2010
July 2010
August 2010
September 2010
October 2010
November 2010
December 2010
|